are things that can be made more WebKit friendly in HbbTV 2.0.
Regards
Graham
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Randall Bennettrandall.benn...@gmail.com
Date : Oct 12, 2012 21:20 (GMT+01:00)
Title : Re: [webkit-dev] HbbTV support within Webkit
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:16
* : Oct 12, 2012 21:20 (GMT+01:00)
*Title* : Re: [webkit-dev] HbbTV support within Webkit
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.comwrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Mark Toller mark.tol...@samsung.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Röttsches
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Mark Toller mark.tol...@samsung.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Röttsches [mailto:dominik.rottsc...@intel.com]
On 10/10/2012 10:26 AM, Mark Toller wrote:
What we
On 10/10/2012 10:26 AM, Mark Toller wrote:
What we would like to see initially is Webkit based browsers (Chrome,
Safari, Minibrowser, etc) actually load HbbTV pages instead of asking the
user to download the content - this would indirectly benefit the end goal of
Webkit (to get everyone to
-Original Message-
From: Dominik Röttsches [mailto:dominik.rottsc...@intel.com]
On 10/10/2012 10:26 AM, Mark Toller wrote:
What we would like to see initially is Webkit based browsers (Chrome,
Safari, Minibrowser, etc) actually load HbbTV pages instead of asking
the user to
Message-
From: aba...@gmail.com [mailto:aba...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adam Barth
Sent: 08 October 2012 19:36
To: Mark Toller
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] HbbTV support within Webkit
From your message, it sounds like HbbTV is still not an open standard.
I'm
Barth
Sent: 08 October 2012 19:36
To: Mark Toller
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] HbbTV support within Webkit
From your message, it sounds like HbbTV is still not an open standard.
I'm skeptical that we should support closed standards in WebKit.
Adam
On Mon
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I still don't get it. CE-HTML is a closed standard and not something
we ever want in WebKit as we are pushing HTML5/Living Standard.
Just to provide some additional input. CE-HMTL, more
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Mark Toller mark.tol...@samsung.com wrote:
I know that support requests for CE-HTML have been briefly touched upon in
the past. As I understand it, the main objection to providing support within
WebKit is that the CE-HTML specification is not freely available,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Mark Toller mark.tol...@samsung.comwrote:
**
I'd like to ask the Webkit developers their opinion on providing some
support for HbbTV [1] within Webkit.
By some support, what exactly do you mean?
Our lab, Samsung Electronics Research Institute (SERI), has
From your message, it sounds like HbbTV is still not an open standard.
I'm skeptical that we should support closed standards in WebKit.
Adam
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Mark Toller mark.tol...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask the Webkit developers their opinion on providing some
Adding support for custom variants of HTML is not really in line with the goals
of the WebKit project. It sounds like CE-HTML and OIPF are both HTML variants.
I don't think these types of features are a good fit for WebKit, because:
(1) Custom HTML dialects tend to create excessive maintenance
12 matches
Mail list logo
