Re: [webkit-dev] PAL Strategy

2017-05-01 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
> On May 1, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Brady Eidson wrote: > > >> On May 1, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> >> I thought the original intent for PAL was to replace WebCore/platform, so I >> assume the criterion would be "stuff currently in

Re: [webkit-dev] PAL Strategy

2017-05-01 Thread Brady Eidson
> On May 1, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I thought the original intent for PAL was to replace WebCore/platform, so I > assume the criterion would be "stuff currently in WebCore/platform." If not, > then I'd question the value of having PAL at all, as

Re: [webkit-dev] PAL Strategy

2017-05-01 Thread Michael Catanzaro
I thought the original intent for PAL was to replace WebCore/platform, so I assume the criterion would be "stuff currently in WebCore/platform." If not, then I'd question the value of having PAL at all, as we really don't need a separate PAL on top of the platform abstraction library we