This seems fine to me.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:09 AM Nicolás Peña <n...@google.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > We'd like to request an official position on a very small addition to > PerformanceTimeline specification. We've added a hasDroppedEntry parameter to > PerformanceObserverCallback, which is in > https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performanceobserver-interface, > and logic for it in > https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#queue-the-performanceobserver-task. > It lets a developer know when an entry has been dropped from a buffer that > the PerformanceObserver cares about. We reached this solution when discussing > https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/169 in a WebPerf WG call. > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
