En 27/04/12 01:19, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu:
See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the
same infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :)
Yeah that's great! I just forgot to replay to that thread :)
In fact... running top 100 websites as performance tests might
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.comwrote:
En 27/04/12 01:19, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu:
See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the
same infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :)
Yeah that's great! I just forgot to replay
See my posts about archive.org-based performance tests. We can use the same
infrastructure to make sure WebKit doesn't crash :)
In fact... running top 100 websites as performance tests might just do the
trick because we'll catch any crashes (can't catch assertion failures
though :( ).
On Sat,
But are you planning to run test builds against live websites? That's
not very polite on people's servers (i certainly wouldn't like anyone
stress-testing my own servers for their benefit). And like some other
people said, tests that rely on network randomness are not very
reliable indicators
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen kbal...@webkit.org wrote:
As the goal is to test real world use case I think it can be even better
...@lists.webkit.org
[mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Peter Kasting
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:01 PM
To: Balazs Kelemen
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen
kbal
-
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-
boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Pablo Flouret
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 2:45 AM
To: Sergio Villar Senin
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal
On Sun, Jan 22
En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu:
Just be careful with copyright issues.
Could you elaborate on that?
BR
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com wrote:
En 21/01/12 14:31, Zoltan Herczeg escribiu:
Just be careful with copyright issues.
Could you elaborate on that?
I believe you'd need explicit permission from each website owner to
keep a (public-facing) copy of the
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Balazs Kelemen kbal...@webkit.org wrote:
As the goal is to test real world use case I think it can be even better
to simply load the sites from network.
I see only two disadvantage of
En 22/01/12 20:24, Thiago Marcos P. Santos escribiu:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret pab...@motorola.com
Maybe instead of storing a local snapshot (assuming you need static
content for the tests), you can use a online snapshot of a top 100
website from http://web.archive.org
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Villar Senin
svil...@igalia.com wrote:
En 22/01/12 20:24, Thiago Marcos P. Santos escribiu:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Flouret pab...@motorola.com
Maybe instead of storing a local snapshot (assuming you need static
content for the tests),
Go for it.
Adam
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug
I'm constantly hitting these days
(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76574) triggered this email
[1]. What I
Just be careful with copyright issues.
Regards,
Zoltan
Go for it.
Adam
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking about this for some time now, but only a recent bug
I'm constantly hitting these days
14 matches
Mail list logo
