Re: [webkit-dev] Webkit License details

2008-11-21 Thread Nilesh Patil
It seems HCL is in hurry to develop browser ;)

Is giving something back to community bad ?

U jst need to check on GPL terms.

Thanks  Regards
Niilesh

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Jayaprakash Palanisamy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,



 If I am developing an application using WebKit rendering engine, do I need
 to provide the source code which I developed to WebKit?



 Thanks and regards,

 Jayaprakash.P

 DISCLAIMER:
 ---

 The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
 intended for the named recipient(s) only.
 It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its
 affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
 this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect
 the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
 Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
 distribution and / or publication of
 this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail
 is strictly prohibited. If you have
 received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
 immediately. Before opening any mail and
 attachments please check them for viruses and defect.

 ---

 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Webkit License details

2008-11-21 Thread Pierre-Luc Beaudoin
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:33 +0530, Jayaprakash Palanisamy wrote:
 
  
 
 If I am developing an application using WebKit rendering engine, do I
 need to provide the source code which I developed to WebKit?

Which port?

The Gtk port is mostly all licenced LGPL 2.1 or later, meaning that you
can have a closed source application using it (aka linked against it).
But that also means that if you made changes to WebKitGtk, those changes
must be published (ideally in a patch in bugzilla).

Explicitly: it means that you can have a closed source browser using
WebKitGtk, but any changes to WebKitGtk itself have to be published.

DISCLAIMER:
---
This is my personal opinion on a legal matter, and since I am not a
layer, this advice is given WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY.  I, nor my employer,
can be held responsible if that advice happens to be wrong.
---

Please see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License

Pierre-Luc Beaudoin
Collabora Ltd.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] Webkit License details

2008-11-21 Thread Pierre-Luc Beaudoin
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 12:22 -0500, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
 I am not a layer

I am not a lawyer actually ;)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev