El vie, 07-10-2016 a las 14:54 +1100, Michael Gratton escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Gustavo Noronha Silva > wrote:
> > Long term, I think it might pay off if we move away from GObject
> > bindings and into making running arbitrary JS code (possibly with
> > access
> > to GObject
Out of curiosity: wouldn't an injected script in the page enabled via
sha-nounce as the only one executable be enough, if CSP support is
available?
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:25 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
>
On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:25 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> That's a very good point, we'll check if that's possible, or wer'll
> try
> to make it possible otherwise.
Wow, I never considered this.
Took a quick look at Epiphany. Guess how many Epiphany features
implemented in JS break when
2016-10-07 5:45 GMT+02:00 Michael Gratton :
>
> Hey Adrián,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions and feedback — I've actually started work on
> this and so am now running into these issues.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Adrián Pérez de Castro
> wrote:
>
> One of
El vie, 07-10-2016 a las 14:45 +1100, Michael Gratton escribió:
>
> Hey Adrián,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions and feedback — I've actually started work
> on this and so am now running into these issues.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Adrián Pérez de Castro a.com> wrote:
>