Hi,
is it possible to disable webkit-gtk default http auth dialog ?
also, is it possible to handle http auth without user interaction ?
Jérémy.
___
webkit-gtk mailing list
webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
On 18/04/2013 07:43, Emmanuel Rodriguez wrote:
> On 17 April 2013 23:23, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> also, is it possible to handle http auth without user interaction ?
>>
> You can disable the default one and provide your own. You need to get a
> handle to the default Soup
On 23/05/2013 11:24, 聂琨琳 wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>I am a student form China.Recently,I am in research how to use WebKit.
> Now I had builded WebKit--gtk on Ubuntu. Then I got a lot of files in the
> “WebKit Build” folder.
> OK,If I want to develop my own browser based on webkit,where should I g
Hi,
using WebKit2-gtk3 2.4.4, this fails to set Cookie header, but succeeds
in setting X-Cookie header:
WebKitURIRequest* request = webkit_uri_request_new(uri);
SoupMessageHeaders* headers =
webkit_uri_request_get_http_headers(request);
soup_message_headers_append(headers, "Cookie", "some=cookie"
webkit_web_resource_get_data is used to get a response data, but in case
of big files, video for example, it can easily eats a lot of memory.
The "received-data" signal would be a very nice place to receive the
data chunks as they are downloaded. Is this possible or does it goes
against webkit arch
Le mercredi 08 octobre 2014 à 16:04 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a
écrit :
> On Dom, 2014-08-31 at 23:31 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > webkit_web_resource_get_data is used to get a response data, but in case
> > of big files, video for example, it can easily eats a lot of memory.
&g
un-top-posting your reply...
Le mercredi 08 octobre 2014 à 12:45 -0700, Jim Nelson a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > Le mercredi 08 octobre 2014 à 16:04 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a
> > écrit :
> >> On Dom, 2014-08-31 at 23:31
Hi,
it seems it is not possible to track websocket requests (or even better
response frames) like it is for http requests using
resource-load-started event.
(this question somehow rejoin my previous question about streaming
response data).
I considered setting a ws: scheme handler, but that would
I thought this wasn't possible with webkit2gtk ?
Le vendredi 31 octobre 2014 à 16:58 -0300, Victor Lucero a écrit :
> Hi. You need to hook to the soup session to get this info it seems
>
> El viernes, 31 de octubre de 2014, Jérémy Lal escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
maybe a bug in webkitgtk:
```
webkit_print_operation_set_print_settings(op, settings);
GtkPageSetup* setup = webkit_print_operation_get_page_setup(op);
// setup is NULL here
```
but the doc says
`It returns NULL until either
webkit_print_operation_set_print_settings() or
webkit_print_operation_r
That's a job for https://github.com/kapouer/node-webkitgtk :)
Le mercredi 19 novembre 2014 à 10:09 -0800, Niranjan Rao a écrit :
> We also use webkit for what essentially boils down to crawling because
> of scenarios liuyang06 said. Ajax driven sites make life very
> interesting as you are not s
Hi,
webkit_web_view_set_transparent has disappeared from webkit2gtk's API.
Is there another way to achieve the same effect ?
Regards,
Jérémy.
___
webkit-gtk mailing list
webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
Hi,
Le lundi 29 décembre 2014 à 10:32 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit :
> El dom, 21-12-2014 a las 02:42 +0100, Jérémy Lal escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > webkit_web_view_set_transparent has disappeared from webkit2gtk's API.
>
> Well, something th
Le lundi 29 décembre 2014 à 10:32 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a écrit :
>
> So, I find all this a bit messy. Exposing these methods in our API is
> easy, but first we need to understand what all those methods do, and
> what we want to expose and how.
Here are more usages described by
https://gith
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2015 à 15:49 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos a
écrit :
> El vie, 16-01-2015 a las 15:38 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos escribió:
> > El jue, 15-01-2015 a las 18:38 +0100, Carlos Garcia Campos escribió:
> > > El jue, 15-01-2015 a las 13:14 +0100, Jérémy Lal es
Hi,
when i open six (!) webviews with a socket.io client started in each of
them, meaning one (or maybe two) pending xhr requests (long polling) or
websockets, the sixth webview socket.io client xhr hangs.
Is there some kind of (low like 5) limit of shared open network
connections between webkitg
Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 04:07 +0100, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> when i open six (!) webviews with a socket.io client started in each of
> them, meaning one (or maybe two) pending xhr requests (long polling) or
> websockets, the sixth webview socket.io client xhr hangs
Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 04:14 +0100, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> Le mercredi 25 février 2015 à 04:07 +0100, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > when i open six (!) webviews with a socket.io client started in each of
> > them, meaning one (or maybe two) pending xhr
Just scroll to the bottom of this page to see what i mean:
http://expressjs.com/4x/api.html
i consistently reproduce that bug over fedora/21 or debian/jessie,
webkitgtk 2.6 or 2.7, but have no idea wether it's a pure gtk bug or
not.
Jérémy.
___
webki
I'm seeing something very weird in a complicated setup here, and am trying to
understand what's happening:
1 - open page urlA, Set-Cookie CA
2 - do xhr requests to urlB (ETag set in response)
3 - load same page urlA, Set-Cookie CB
4 - do xhr request to urlB 304 (If-None-Match hit), a response is s
2015-03-24 21:21 GMT+01:00 Jérémy Lal :
> I'm seeing something very weird in a complicated setup here, and am trying to
> understand what's happening:
>
> 1 - open page urlA, Set-Cookie CA
> 2 - do xhr requests to urlB (ETag set in response)
> 3 - load same page urlA
2015-03-25 11:29 GMT+01:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 11:20 +0100, Jérémy Lal escribió:
>> 2015-03-25 9:01 GMT+01:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
>> > El mar, 24-03-2015 a las 22:48 +0100, Jérémy Lal escribió:
>> >> 2015-03-24 21:21 GMT+01:00 J
Hi,
in webkit2gtk 2.6 to 2.8 on linux (i did not check other versions),
webkit_web_view_load_* methods seem to be spending more time
than i expect before reaching WEBKIT_LOAD_COMMITTED signal.
Hundreds of milliseconds when loading a local file or an html string
of a locally hosted "regular" websit
2015-03-25 11:38 GMT+01:00 Jérémy Lal :
> 2015-03-25 11:29 GMT+01:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> > El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 11:20 +0100, Jérémy Lal escribió:
> >> 2015-03-25 9:01 GMT+01:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> >> > El mar, 24-03-2015 a las 22:48 +0100, Jérémy Lal e
Hi,
i'd like to code that idea !
I would be able to do it quite easily if there was a dbus service
for gpg encryption.
Any idea if gnome-keyring do that ? If that's already being worked on ?
If a new webkit extension concept will make that work deprecated ?
Thanks for any insight.
Jérémy
___
Hi,
at some point this year (maybe webkitgtk 2.8) it was possible
to "play" a video on a webview in an offscreen gtk window.
Now it consistently fail with videoNode.networkState == 3,
and works all right as soon as the window is not offscreen.
I am not sure it's something that has to do with web
This file:
epiphany-browser
https://camo.githubusercontent.com/d0aad8bda1ffca6c06210c1c5edf2bacc5e23ff5/687474703a2f2f672e7265636f726469742e636f2f74644c664c59573443662e676966
crashes the tab on linu/debian (sid) with webkit2gtk 2.10.6
i'm not sure it's a webkit-gtk bug, though, so i'd to get a qu
Context:
I want to prevent iframes from loading.
I naively looked into getting the frame from which a policy decision came,
or the frame for which a send request (in the extension) is called, but i
can't find a
way to get an actual frame instance from which
webkit_frame_is_main_frame(frame)
would t
I was trying to do so using webkit2gtk 2.12, but the API seems to not allow
this.
It would have been nice to be able to pass construct only properties to
webkit_web_view_new()
like it is possible with webkit_website_data_manager_new(...).
Regards,
Jérémy.
_
2016-03-31 15:21 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal :
> I was trying to do so using webkit2gtk 2.12, but the API seems to not
> allow this.
>
> It would have been nice to be able to pass construct only properties to
> webkit_web_view_new()
> like it is possible with webkit_website_data_manage
Hi,
i always wondered why loading bytes into an already instantiated webview
took so much time (~600ms) between the webkit_web_view_load_bytes() call
and the first
"change" event.
Today i noticed that doing it twice in a row (< one second) reduced that
time for
the second call from ~600ms to ~100
2016-06-03 11:36 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal :
> Hi,
>
> i always wondered why loading bytes into an already instantiated webview
> took so much time (~600ms) between the webkit_web_view_load_bytes() call
> and the first
> "change" event.
>
> Today i noticed that doi
2016-06-03 16:18 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal :
>
>
> 2016-06-03 11:36 GMT+02:00 Jérémy Lal :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i always wondered why loading bytes into an already instantiated webview
>> took so much time (~600ms) between the webkit_web_view_load_bytes() call
>> an
I noticed version 2.14 is significantly slower to load several web views
one after another.
By load time i mean the time between a call to `webkit_web_view_load_uri()`
and the first
WEBKIT_LOAD_STARTED change event.
In version 2.12 it takes half a second for the first load and less than
100ms
whe
2016-09-21 13:54 GMT+02:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> El mié, 21-09-2016 a las 12:05 +0200, Jérémy Lal escribió:
> > I noticed version 2.14 is significantly slower to load several web
> > views one after another.
> >
> > By load time i mean the time between a call to
&g
2016-09-21 14:32 GMT+02:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> El mié, 21-09-2016 a las 14:17 +0200, Jérémy Lal escribió:
> > 2016-09-21 13:54 GMT+02:00 Carlos Garcia Campos :
> > > El mié, 21-09-2016 a las 12:05 +0200, Jérémy Lal escribió:
> > > > I noticed version 2.14 i
2016-10-07 5:45 GMT+02:00 Michael Gratton :
>
> Hey Adrián,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions and feedback — I've actually started work on
> this and so am now running into these issues.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Adrián Pérez de Castro
> wrote:
>
> One of the things that needs to be taken
Hi,
unless i did not find the right bit of documentation, i just get
WEBKIT_NAVIGATION_TYPE_OTHER
for both navigation actions (setting document.location or setting an
iframe src).
Could more navigation types be exposed, or is there nothing more
precise to expose ?
Jérémy
___
Also it's simpler to setup a limited javascript -> main process event
listener using a "script message handler".
2017-09-13 17:46 GMT+02:00 Leo Ufimtsev :
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> I'm doing something similar right now.
>
> For webkit2:
> - you need to compile a webextension
> - The web extension deal
It's a website for testing variable fonts.
Jérémy
___
webkit-gtk mailing list
webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
Done !
2018-09-07 13:58 GMT+02:00 Sergio Villar Senin :
> O Ven, 07-09-2018 ás 09:39 +0200, Jérémy Lal escribiu:
> > It's a website for testing variable fonts.
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> Mind filing a bug in bugs.webkit.org? That's the place where we track
Hi,
Does webkit(gtk) offer a way to detect client javascript that does things
like that:
```
while (true) {}
```
Jérémy
___
webkit-gtk mailing list
webkit-gtk@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-gtk
Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019 à 15:38, Konstantin Tokarev a
écrit :
>
>
> 11.04.2019, 16:31, "Rena" :
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 05:34 Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Does webkit(gtk) offer a way to detect client javascript tha
43 matches
Mail list logo
