On 22.12.2007, at 18:58, Miguel Arroz wrote:
I don't know for sure, but I see no reason to not work. WO Apps
respond the same way via their sockets on Tiger or Leopard (they are
the same apps and same frameworks), so I guess it doesn't matter.
But try it first! :)
Actually, everybody who
anging from
Apache 1 to Apache 2, and so the Adaptor is different. Besides
that, everything should be smooth.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2007/12/23, at 00:59, George Domurot wrote:
WO Deploy List: Does anyone know if this configuration is
supported?
Leopard Web Server w/Tiger WO App S
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2007/12/23, at 00:59, George Domurot wrote:
WO Deploy List: Does anyone know if this configuration is supported?
Leopard Web Server w/Tiger WO App Servers
--
George Domurot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Do not post admin
wrote:
WO Deploy List: Does anyone know if this configuration is supported?
Leopard Web Server w/Tiger WO App Servers
--
George Domurot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-deploy m
and so the Adaptor is different. Besides that,
everything should be smooth.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2007/12/23, at 00:59, George Domurot wrote:
WO Deploy List: Does anyone know if this configuration is supported?
Leopard Web Server w/Tiger WO App Servers
--
George Domurot
[EMAI
WO Deploy List: Does anyone know if this configuration is supported?
Leopard Web Server w/Tiger WO App Servers
--
George Domurot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-deploy mailing
