On 20 jan 2008, at 01:21, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 19.01.2008, at 15:11, Johan Henselmans wrote:
I planned it to only use it for the backend application to add
products and product categories, and uploading pictures of the
products. That's it. just give a feel of DirectToWeb. Explain the
Galen,
If you're interested in building a .WAR containing the embedded jar
frameworks, you can do this quite easily with Maven. WOCreator is a
Maven 2 plugin that you can use to create the initial project
structure for a Maven project that will build a WebObjects application
as a stand-al
On 19.01.2008, at 15:11, Johan Henselmans wrote:
I planned it to only use it for the backend application to add
products and product categories, and uploading pictures of the
products. That's it. just give a feel of DirectToWeb. Explain the
rule system, and how to customize a part. The othe
On 19.01.2008, at 15:53, David Elliott wrote:
After a few tutorials though, D2W ought to be introduced because
it's by far the most useful feature for a beginner.
I totally disagree with that as long as you don't dive into
"Wonder"land. You'll end up with locking applications, miserable
p
Johan,
Your proposed tutorial would have been extremely beneficial when I was
starting. Especialy since my first real project was a media content
site using D2W. Looking forward to seeing it when its done.
-david
On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Johan Henselmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
O
Hi Guido,
I must say I completely disagree with most of what you've said.
Almost exactly three years ago I got started with WebObjects. I had
about 3 weeks to come up with a prototype and 4 weeks to deliver
something that met the basic requirements. Having only ever really
played aroun
D2W without a proper assistant is. So how is one suppose to learn
D2W? How did you learn it?
I am not going to demonstrate all the intricacies of a d2w app:
just standard interface, a login routine, and a file-upload for a
picture. That's it, for now. It is meant to be a tutorial for
begi
On 19 jan 2008, at 22:01, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 19.01.2008, at 13:47, Johan Henselmans wrote:
The application would be a shop, with a D2W backend for the
products (with ERAttachment for the product-pictures), fulfilment
(some kind of app that could run in an ipod touch) and some
statis
Pierre (or Mr. Pierre Frisch if you prefer),
Thanks a lot for your involvement in the mailing list.
But are you aware that none of your messages makes it to the diggests?
All I receive is:
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-- next part
--
A non-text attachme
On 19.01.2008, at 13:47, Johan Henselmans wrote:
The application would be a shop, with a D2W backend for the products
(with ERAttachment for the product-pictures), fulfilment (some kind
of app that could run in an ipod touch) and some statistics app that
would make use of displaygroups and
I am trying to write a tutorial for developing a webobjects
application in WOLips. The idea would be to add the separate chapters
as PDF's and Projects to the WODOC website, next to Pascal's podcasts.
The tool would be WOLiips and WebObjects 54x, plus assorted Frameworks
(Wonder, LEWOStuff,
I don't think so.
For a sanity test I created a two new components with identical
information found in Main.wo and the other component in the landing
page. Then I changed the default action to point to the new landing
page.
That worked!
I've gone through .xcodeproj folder and the PB.pro
Uli,
This is not the same thing. The embed option would embed the legacy
frameworks, JavaEOGenerator uses the newer jar frameworks, but I agree
with you it does nearly the same thing. Embedding jar frameworks have
been supported since WebObjects 5.2.
Before anyone starts again there are n
WebObjects 5.4 introduced a static field to the NSBundle class to
allow access to the Info.plist short version string. I've checked
framework versions as a run-time safety net against version skew
issues for a few years, and wondered if this field becoming more
accessible would help in any
On 19-Jan-08, at 9:47 AM, Galen Rhodes wrote:
I've been looking at the way JavaEOGenerator has the WO frameworks
packaged into it and was wondering if this process has been
documented anywhere?
It would be cool if one could package a WO application as a complete
unit that could then be d
Moin Galen,
embed does the trick:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/WOApplication
Uli
Am 19.01.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Galen Rhodes:
I've been looking at the way JavaEOGenerator has the WO frameworks
packaged into it and was wondering if this process has been
documented anyw
I've been looking at the way JavaEOGenerator has the WO frameworks
packaged into it and was wondering if this process has been documented
anywhere?
It would be cool if one could package a WO application as a complete
unit that could then be downloaded and run without having WO
previously
On 19/01/2008, at 12:32 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Sounds like your DirectAction class has a bug in it. Is there
anything unusual in it?
You've also eliminated any Eclipse anomalies by doing a clean build
(Project > Clean...)?
On Jan 18, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Jonathan Miller wrote:
hmmm
i
Hi John,
see if this helps...
On 18/01/2008, at 9:28 PM, John Pollard wrote:
On 18 Jan 2008, at 03:35, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 18/01/2008, at 2:44 AM, John Pollard wrote:
Many thanks for your reply. I do do all the default timezone
setting in my application, client and server side. However
19 matches
Mail list logo
