Adaptor Zapped

Looks like the el Capitan update zapped /System/Library/WebObjects and the WOAdaptor went with it … I really should have moved it earlier :-) ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list

Re: Wonder acronym survey

I only use prefixes for component names these days, primarily because I tend to do a lot of refactoring during development (renaming components and moving them between packages). If the WOLips component editor supported refactoring (global component renaming) I’d quit that in a heartbeat and

ERGroupware and ERRest

Hello, I am on the planning stage of a new REST-web-service-based app with a Cocoa client. In my head, it makes sense to have a web interface (a Direct Action or D2W app) just for user management, where the administrative users would be able to create/edit/delete users and specify their

Ponder and ERRest (was "Re: ERGroupware and ERRest")

I must be insane! I didn’t mean ERGroupware, but Ponder! Please, replace any occurrence of “ERGroupware” with “Ponder” in my original text. Sorry for the noise. Flavio > On 05/10/2015, at 17:08, Flavio Donadio wrote: > > Hello, > > > I am on the planning stage of a

Re: ERMailDeliveryHTML outside the RR-Loop

Hi Christoph, ERXWOContext.newContext() should do what you want. Fabian > Am 04.10.2015 um 21:07 schrieb CHRISTOPH WICK | i4innovation GmbH, Bonn > : > > Hi List, > > I'd like to send batch emails in a separate thread using ERMailDeliveryHTML > and a Component based

Re: ERMailDeliveryHTML outside the RR-Loop

Hi Christoph, this is what I’ve been using in the past. Maybe a bit too complicated, but it works without leaking sessions. public static void fillMailWithContentFromComponentInBackgroundThread(ERMailDeliveryHTML mail, String pageName, NSDictionary values) {

Re: NoSQL

Hi, > On 01 Oct 2015, at 20:22, Gino Pacitti wrote: > > Has anyone any thoughts on NoSQL and WO integrations and usage? as well chiming in as "depends on what you are thinking of" :-) With the recent better support of JSON / JSONB in Postgres 9.4 we decided that this gives a

Re: Abandonware???

Hi Ray, That's it. We, as WebObjects developers, want to move forward with our projects. We need to make changes to the original code. It's inevitable. Reverse engineering the code is our best alternative in that sense. If we were convinced that Apple won't sue us, would anyone object this

Re: Ponder and ERRest (was "Re: ERGroupware and ERRest")

Ramsey, I've just finished watching you WOWODC ’13 presentation on Ponder. That’s exactly what I need. Congratulations for the framework and presentation. I’ll just use a R2D2W app for user management, as I don’t need a fancy layout. And I’ll get password reset and other fancy features for

Re: Abandonware???

On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:54:37 -0400 David LeBer wrote: > WebObjects - the set of frameworks used by Apple == Not Abandonware > WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the > community through Wonder == Not Abandonware > WebObjects - the set of

Fwd: Abandonware???

> Begin forwarded message: > > From: webobjects-dev-ow...@lists.apple.com > Subject: Re: Abandonware??? > Date: October 5, 2015 at 6:02:01 PM EDT > To: p...@me.com > > You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has > been automatically rejected. If you think that your

Re: Ponder and ERRest (was "Re: ERGroupware and ERRest")

ERUsers can probably do what you want. You would create a role named Admin and then override the 10 : (entity.model.name = 'ERUsers' or pageConfiguration = 'CreateERUser') => crudAuthorization = "er.users.delegates.AuthorizationDelegate.INSTANCE" [ERDEnumAssignment] rule with something like

Re: ERGroupware and ERRest

> Le 2015-10-05 à 16:08, Flavio Donadio a écrit : > > Hello, > > > I am on the planning stage of a new REST-web-service-based app with a Cocoa > client. > > In my head, it makes sense to have a web interface (a Direct Action or D2W > app) just for user management,

Wonder acronym survey

Just a two minute script result, with most false positives filtered out. Sometimes I wonder whether we can even not use prefixes, if we had proper package structure. These things remind me of the people around the South Bay (here in northern CA), who say "the El Camino Real Blvd", which

EOQualifier for an optional to many relationship

I have an optional many-2-many relationship between entities A and B. EntityModeler creates a join table with nothing modelled but the logical m:n relationships. Now I need a qualifier to fetch all As that are either assigned to a given B or not assigned at all. Following part works (finding

Re: Abandonware???

Hi Paul, "Although such software is usually still under copyright, the owner may not be tracking or enforcing copyright violations." Apple doesn’t need to release the copyright to turn WebObjects into Abandonware. I see no problem if we declare WebObjects as Abandonware and Apple doesn’t

Re: ERMailDeliveryHTML outside the RR-Loop

Hi All: ERMailUtils.instantiatePage() will, in turn, call ERXApplication.instantiatePage() which calls ERXWOContext.newContext(). It will get you to the same destination. Tim UCLA GSE > On Oct 5, 2015, at 12:18 AM, Fabian Peters wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > >

Re: EOQualifier for an optional to many relationship

"fetch all As that are either assigned to a given B or not assigned at all". That sounds like a right outer join. You can set the join semantics on the relationship in EOModeler. You probably don't want that for the main relationship, but I think you can define one that is not a class