I wish we could as a group finance an update to WO and make it viable. So many
people now writing with Node, park and Python for asynchronous services...
> On 2 Jan 2020, at 18:31, Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi all… and Happy New Year !
>
> For this new year, I’de lik
Sounds like you have your feet straddling two different worlds.
You could consider building parts of your app in pure JS while other parts in
WO. You could do persistence with REST for your pure JS apps that are served by
WORest. You could use JSON web tokens to have authentication that is shar
We only need it for our web commerce app were the front-end part of changes is
really important.
The advantage of this, compare to use jQuery inside the client browser, is the
possiblities to :
- avoid the one-javascript-with-bug-blocks the entire page
- call other apis without showing it to the
I see.
Well, that’s a bit of a trick but of course, you can decide what you’d like to
do.
I once realized that my UI elements often needed settings, defaults and
configurations to exist in javascript — it seemed a waste and trouble to create
new components of course, in my case, I use a lot o
Hi Jesse,
for the moment we are using jquery to modify the html code, but after rendering
in the client browser and our front end designers don’t feel like « real »
developpers.
I would like to give the possibility to our front-end (javascript) designers to
add their custom js code without hav
I might be confused —
Don’t you already have control at both ends?
> On Jan 2, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi all… and Happy New Year !
>
> For this new year, I’de like to add a javascript postprocessor to the
> webobjects response.
>
> I mean I would
Hi all… and Happy New Year !
For this new year, I’de like to add a javascript postprocessor to the
webobjects response.
I mean I would like to give our front-end developpers the possiblity to rewrite
the reponse… before sending it to the customer.
Have any of you already done such a mechanism