Pt. Eclipse is so yesterday. I created a D2JC-based Text Editor / IDE
called DaveLips™ It exclusively uses Vertical Inheritance in it’s modeling
component and it is deployed in a servlet container.
On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Chuck Hill ch...@gevityinc.com wrote:
Dave, have you been
Is it checked in? I think the entire community needs to try out DaveLips
(YIKES)
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:23 AM, David Avendasora webobje...@avendasora.com
wrote:
Pt. Eclipse is so yesterday. I created a D2JC-based Text Editor / IDE
called DaveLips™ It exclusively uses Vertical
Aand there it is. The death of the usefulness of this thread (and the
highpoint of my day).
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Ken Anderson kenli...@anderhome.com wrote:
Is it checked in? I think the entire community needs to try out DaveLips
(YIKES)
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:23 AM, David
really weird conversation for me, too….
On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Chuck Hill ch...@gevityinc.com wrote:
Thanks. Now I have to go wash my mind out.
On 2015-04-29, 7:53 AM, Tom Philip wrote:
Nothing of mine will be put into DaveLips.
Ever.
Tom
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Ken
Thanks. Now I have to go wash my mind out.
On 2015-04-29, 7:53 AM, Tom Philip wrote:
Nothing of mine will be put into DaveLips.
Ever.
Tom
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Ken Anderson
kenli...@anderhome.commailto:kenli...@anderhome.com wrote:
Is it checked in? I think the entire community
Nothing of mine will be put into DaveLips.
Ever.
Tom
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Ken Anderson kenli...@anderhome.com wrote:
Is it checked in? I think the entire community needs to try out DaveLips
(YIKES)
On Apr 29, 2015, at 7:23 AM, David Avendasora webobje...@avendasora.com
On Apr 29, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Thomas Philip tphi...@omtay.org wrote:
Nothing of mine will be put into DaveLips.
Ever.
That’s probably just fine. All code going into DaveLips will need to be
extensively beer-reviewed, anyway.
I am planning on pulling *frequently* into DaveLips and,
The standard WO exception page is starting to show its age and I think it’s
high time we improve it.
Ehhx... Ehhhxsep... Exseeeption?
Are you referring to the page that WO always returns until my code has been
peer-reviewed?
If so, I do think your new one is pretty darn nice!
Dave
Very, very nice .. A suggestion that might be over-kill: A button for “send
error to developer” (maybe if, and only if, a Property with a target email
exists). I get screenshots from customers now, if they know how to make them;
or copy/paste emails if they know where to send them ..
On Apr
On Apr 27, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Gavin Eadie ga...@umich.edu wrote:
A suggestion that might be over-kill: A button for “send error to developer”
(maybe if, and only if, a Property with a target email exists).
.. as pointed out by others, probably not for production, but I could imagine a
Dave, have you been typing in Eclipse again?
On 2015-04-26, 11:02 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
The standard WO exception page is starting to show its age and I think it's
high time we improve it.
Ehhx... Ehhhxsep... Exseeeption?
Are you referring to the page that WO always returns until
Hi all.
The standard WO exception page is starting to show its age and I think it’s
high time we improve it. I started a new error page today and added the
capability to show the code that’s throwing the error (a feature of some of the
younger web frameworks that I like) but I’d love to hear
You'd never put that in a _production_ release though, would you?
Looks perfect for development, but in production I'd prefer my exception
views to be pretty generic with a non-technical message, unless the app is
for internal staff. So, er, that's what we do.
Yeah, I would not want
On 27 Apr 2015, at 7:09 am, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
The standard WO exception page is starting to show its age and I think it’s
high time we improve it. I started a new error page today and added the
capability to show the code that’s throwing the error (a feature of some of
I agree, looks great!
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 26, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Paul Hoadley pa...@logicsquad.net wrote:
On 27 Apr 2015, at 7:09 am, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
The standard WO exception page is starting to show its age and I think it’s
high time we improve it. I
That looks really nice.
You'd never put that in a _production_ release though, would you?
Looks perfect for development, but in production I'd prefer my exception
views to be pretty generic with a non-technical message, unless the app
is for internal staff. So, er, that's what we do.
Aside: am
On 2015-04-26, 8:34 PM, Matthew Ness wrote:
That looks really nice.
Yes, nice work!
You'd never put that in a _production_ release though, would you?
Looks perfect for development, but in production I'd prefer my exception views
to be pretty generic with a non-technical message, unless the
On 27 Apr 2015, at 1:08 pm, Chuck Hill ch...@gevityinc.com wrote:
You'd never put that in a _production_ release though, would you?
Looks perfect for development, but in production I'd prefer my exception
views to be pretty generic with a non-technical message, unless the app is
for
On 2015-04-26, 8:43 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Aside: am I mis-remembering, or did the Yellow Box exception view include a
link to the IDE code base class and line in development, you know, a zillion
years ago?
Now that you mention it, I recall this too.
Oh you old timers. I'll get off your
19 matches
Mail list logo
