On Oct 25, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:59 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2010-10-25, at 3:53 PM, Stefan Klein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> there is an online petition: "Contribute the Apple JDK source to OpenJDK"
>>> (http://www.petitionspot.com/petiti
On Oct 25, 2010, at 1:20 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> I would, but I don't think you can use me as a representative of the dev
> community as a whole.
Shudder. I'd hope not! :-P
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want
>> IIRC, the WO license requires you to develop on mac os.
>
> No, it just requires you to develop on an Apple-branded computer. It doesn't
> say anything about what OS it must be running.
oh ok.
hey - i just found a reason for those crappy white apple stickers that
come with just about everythi
With people like Google, Atlassian and Alfresco using a lot of OS X machines
for Java devs, either people will bring OpenJDK up to speed or Oracle will
release a JVM. Not counting Lotus Notes (IBM) who is a Eclipse RCP app since
version 7.
> It only requires apple branded hardware. So we can a
It only requires apple branded hardware. So we can always dump OS X
for linux...
Ramsey
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Simon wrote:
another interesting (related) question:
IIRC, the WO license requires you to develop on mac os. that's gonna
be pretty difficult if there's no suitable JDK... ?
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Simon wrote:
> another interesting (related) question:
>
> IIRC, the WO license requires you to develop on mac os.
No, it just requires you to develop on an Apple-branded computer. It doesn't
say anything about what OS it must be running.
But, if you're not going
another interesting (related) question:
IIRC, the WO license requires you to develop on mac os. that's gonna
be pretty difficult if there's no suitable JDK... ?
On 25 October 2010 19:49, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but I'm trying to get a handle on the impact of usin
Am 25.10.10 21:59, schrieb David LeBer:
On 2010-10-25, at 3:53 PM, Stefan Klein wrote:
Hi List,
there is an online petition: "Contribute the Apple JDK source to OpenJDK"
(http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/macjdk).
I don't think Apple will take any care, but a try won't harm.
Just be care
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:59 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
> On 2010-10-25, at 3:53 PM, Stefan Klein wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> there is an online petition: "Contribute the Apple JDK source to OpenJDK"
>> (http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/macjdk).
>> I don't think Apple will take any care, but a
On 2010-10-25, at 3:53 PM, Stefan Klein wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> there is an online petition: "Contribute the Apple JDK source to OpenJDK"
> (http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/macjdk).
> I don't think Apple will take any care, but a try won't harm.
Just be careful, if you sign in with twitter
Hi List,
there is an online petition: "Contribute the Apple JDK source to
OpenJDK" (http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/macjdk).
I don't think Apple will take any care, but a try won't harm.
Stefan
Am 25.10.10 20:49, schrieb Andrew Lindesay:
Hello;
Excuse my ignorance, but I'm trying to
I made a quick test with OpenJDK 1.7 yesterday night, and the WO app was
working fine. Will try to build Wonder with it this week.
But I do saw problems with OpenJDK 1.6 for running the Atlassian products on
our Linux box, I had to use Sun's JVM for that case.
> Hello;
>
> Excuse my ignorance,
Hello;
Excuse my ignorance, but I'm trying to get a handle on the impact of using
OpenJDK for WebObjects and other java dev going forward if there's no
"official" JDK for MacOS-X. I understand that OpenJDK on MacOS-X uses X11 for
GUI material (swing/AWT) which would seem tolerable, but are the
13 matches
Mail list logo
