Re: Current Status of WO

2010-09-29 Thread Paul D Yu
And for you app, you may want to look at ERRest framework. Paul On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists. >> Lots of users, small data fo

Re: Current Status of WO

2010-09-29 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote: > Hi list, > > I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists. > Lots of users, small data footprint (about 10k per request). PostgreSQL. > I consider using WO and EOF again because it served me well in the last > (

Re: Current Status of WO

2010-09-29 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2010-09-29 à 14:28, Alexander Spohr a écrit : > Hi list, > > I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists. > Lots of users, small data footprint (about 10k per request). PostgreSQL. > I consider using WO and EOF again because it served me well in the last > (almo

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Q
On 16/02/2009, at 9:59 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! On 2009/02/15, at 23:41, Q wrote: /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/ Adaptors Why don't I have that directory? Do I have to install some extra package? My bad. /Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/Adapt

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Q
On 16/02/2009, at 10:14 AM, Mark Ritchie wrote: On 15-Feb-09, at 6:59 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: On 2009/02/15, at 23:41, Q wrote: /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/ Adaptors Why don't I have that directory? Do I have to install some extra package? That looks like

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! That's it! :) Thanks! Yours Miguel Arroz On 2009/02/16, at 00:14, Mark Ritchie wrote: On 15-Feb-09, at 6:59 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: On 2009/02/15, at 23:41, Q wrote: /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/ Adaptors Why don't I have that directory? Do I have t

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Mark Ritchie
On 15-Feb-09, at 6:59 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: On 2009/02/15, at 23:41, Q wrote: /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/ Adaptors Why don't I have that directory? Do I have to install some extra package? That looks like a custom folder structure to support multiple ver

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! On 2009/02/15, at 23:41, Q wrote: /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects/Source/Adaptors Why don't I have that directory? Do I have to install some extra package? - What about the Wonder adaptor? I saw, in the repository history, that there's a recent commit with

Re: Current status of WO Adaptors

2009-02-15 Thread Q
On 16/02/2009, at 8:43 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! What's the status of the current Apache 2.2 adaptors? Namely: - I have the idea that Apple would make their adaptor open source on 5.4. Is this correct? If so, where's the code? /Developer/WebObjects543/Developer/Examples/WebObjects