BTW, you actually don't have to do then full AjaxResponse thing ...
That adds some other abilities. I think it's enough to just do
AjaxUtils.updateMutableUserInfoWithAjaxInfo(response). But wrapping
in an AjaxResponse shouldn't hurt anything.
ms
On Jun 21, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Mike Schrag w
As long as you are not returning HTML that contains component
actions, I think this will be enough (meaning if you're just fire-and-
forget to an action in the background). If you are returning HTML
results with component actions in them and replacing page contents
with it, you will need to
Got it, I was already using ERXSession but I looked again at what I
was doing and discovered I was indeed being naive and care free with
use of a plain old new WOResponse() with my HTML in. I modified this
to an AjaxUtils.createResponse() hopefully I think means people could
submit the form
Keep in mind that your backtrack cache WILL get blown out if you're
not using something like the code in ERXAjaxSession from Ajax
framework. It will tease you by appearing to work fine, but it's
only a tease.
ms
On Jun 20, 2007, at 3:35 AM, Paul Stringer wrote:
You're done an Ajax submit
I've used JQuery with WebObjects and it works. It's advantage is its
lighter than prototype/scriptaculous at only 19k for the core
library, it's fast and it's got a very nice syntax and it's non
intrusive on your code. It's what I started out using before
Prototype so I prefer it probably
ts-Dev Mailing List
Subject: Re: JS libraries used with WO
Hi Jess,
We've been using lots of prototype, excellent for ajax and is the
basis for script.aculo.us. Scriptaculous/Prototype are the basis
for the Project Wonder ajax framework, which is a great way to get started
doing ajax with wo
Hi Jess,
We've been using lots of prototype, excellent for ajax and is the
basis for script.aculo.us. Scriptaculous/Prototype are the basis
for the Project Wonder ajax framework, which is a great way to get
started doing ajax with wo.
Prototype:
http://www.prototypejs.org/
Wonder:
http
HA! thanks, chuck! yea, I've noticed that secret google site--
the question is, what people on the list doing a lot of AJAX type
work lately? what sorts of things are you doing with it?
I was sort of thinking discussion...
jess
On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
There is this
There is this very cool technology that you probably have not heard
of. It is a pretty deep secret right now. The code name is Google.
Here is a quick example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=WebObjects+Ajax
Wow!
Chuck
On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Jesse Tayler wrote:
What sorts o
