On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet tasting,
hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert going to
be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking about
On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently
sweet tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question
is: when's desert going to be served? :-)
actually not in this
On 2010-02-17, at 10:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet
tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet
tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert
going to be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking about making a
new template that was ajaxy, you might
On 17-Feb-10, at 10:45 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently
sweet tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question
is: when's desert going to be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking
about
Am 15.02.2010 um 23:39 schrieb James Cicenia:
Maybe it means to take RuleEditor up a notch or two or three? That is at
least a codebase.
A simple WO-based RuleEditor is part of Examples/Misc/DevStudio (I have no idea
if it still works, and no, I don't remember anything helpful about it). My
If you mean I don't even know which components are candidates and how they
look then you can look at D2WComponentTour. Otherwise I don't understand what
you mean.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 15.02.2010 um 23:39 schrieb James Cicenia:
3) A relationship editor.
a) Use prototype for display
On 16/02/2010, at 4:11 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-02-15, at 6:36 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I think the idea of a very robust Ajax capable template would be ideal.
That way it can at least have its footing on the right foundation.
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet tasting,
hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert going to
be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking about making a new
template that was ajaxy, you might want
On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet tasting,
hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert going to
be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking about
I have spent the last few weeks diving into D2W and Wonder.
Amazing stuff... anyway.
What would it take to make a new WebAssistant for D2W maybe WonderWebAssistant ?
I believe that to make a slick, ajaxy, WonderWebAssistant with choice of
Templates would
do more for promoting WebObjects than
On Feb 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
I have spent the last few weeks diving into D2W and Wonder.
Amazing stuff... anyway.
What would it take to make a new WebAssistant for D2W maybe
WonderWebAssistant ?
Talent and time. :-P
I believe that to make a slick, ajaxy
On 2010-02-15, at 3:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
I have spent the last few weeks diving into D2W and Wonder.
Amazing stuff... anyway.
What would it take to make a new WebAssistant for D2W maybe
WonderWebAssistant ?
Talent and time
and Wonder.
Amazing stuff... anyway.
What would it take to make a new WebAssistant for D2W maybe
WonderWebAssistant ?
Talent and time. :-P
I believe that to make a slick, ajaxy, WonderWebAssistant with choice of
Templates would
do more for promoting WebObjects than any other
I think the idea of a very robust Ajax capable template would be ideal. That
way it can at least have its footing on the right foundation.
Don't spend time working on this.
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
On Feb 15, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I think the idea of a very robust Ajax capable template would be ideal. That
way it can at least have its footing on the right foundation.
Don't spend time working on this.
ms
What you talkin' about Willis?
Ramsey
smime.p7s
On 2010-02-15, at 6:36 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I think the idea of a very robust Ajax capable template would be ideal.
That way it can at least have its footing on the right foundation.
Don't spend time working on this.
ms
What
17 matches
Mail list logo
