On 30/06/2007, at 6:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
Their refusal to ever consider open sourcing it (in spite of how
Steve Jobs rants about how he looooooooooves open source) makes me
feel even more animosity about the platform.
I think I know why they won't do this. No, I won't tell you. :-P
But it is a very sound business reason.
I know that apple have patents they need to protect, and their
internal disclosure policy doesn't lend itself to open source
projects at all. But It would be good if the source were made
available under a "look but don't touch, don't redistribute, don't
talk about fight club" license, it would be enough to help with
understanding how and why some of the darker corners of WO work, and
allow for contributing more detailed bug reports into radar. I can't
see this happening any time soon, but it would be nice to have a
legitimate way to do this.
--
Seeya...Q
Quinton Dolan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)
Ph: +61 419 729 806
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
