Re: ERD2WQueryDateRange ignores formatter??

2015-02-04 Thread Ramsey Gurley
ERD2WQueryDateRange doesn’t use an ajax date picker. ERMD2WQueryDateRange does, 
but the default on that one is %m/%d/%Y”

Do you have click-to-open enabled? What does that say the component is? Or 
maybe do some debug logging on the componentName key to see what component is 
being used there. It is not ERD2WQueryDateRange if it is using ajax. 

My guess is you’re using ERMD2WQueryDateRange if you are using Modern. (By the 
looks of your screenshot, you are)  If it is that component, putting a 
breakpoint in the formatter() method might be enlightening.

On Feb 4, 2015, at 6:56 AM, Markus Ruggiero mailingli...@kataputt.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I have a problem getting ERD2WQueryDateRange to display the date in proper 
 format.
 
 The following rule 
 120 : propertyKey = requestDate = formatter = %d-%m-%Y 
 [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 
 is accepted and when checking with the D2W debugger I see the proper 
 formatter:
 
 PastedGraphic-1.png
 
 but when accepting the ajax date picker the date is shown in the order 
 Year-Month-Day (eg. 2014-12-23).
 
 Customer is complaining because this is the only place in the whole app where 
 the date format is wrong. All other
 places are ok.
 
 When looking at the bindings of ERD2WQueryDateRange everything looks ok, 
 formatter is properly referenced and bound
 to WOTextField dateformat.
 
 I must be missing something obvious - but WHAT???
 
 Thanks for any help
 ---markus---
 
 CU @ WOWODC15
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
 
 This email sent to rgur...@smarthealth.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Is there a D2W input length limiting component?

2015-02-04 Thread Markus Ruggiero
Before I try to create something on my own

I need a text input that can limit the length of the text entered to eg 2000 
chars and display a running counter so that the user knows immediately how much 
he has left. 

Is there something in (D2W) Wonder?

Thanks for any pointer
---markus---

CU @ WOWODC15 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: ERD2WQueryDateRange ignores formatter??

2015-02-04 Thread Theodore Petrosky
when you are viewing the page with the date, and you display the D2W 
components, what component is displaying the date?

155 : propertyKey = requestDate  = componentName = ERD2WDisplayDateOrNull 
[com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]

does that do anything for you?



On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Flavio Donadio fla...@donadio.com.br wrote:

 Markus,
 
 
 Whatever you're missing, I'm missing... Please, let me know if you ever find 
 a solution to this problem.
 
 
 Cheers,
 Flavio
 
 
 On 04/02/2015, at 11:56, Markus Ruggiero mailingli...@kataputt.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I have a problem getting ERD2WQueryDateRange to display the date in proper 
 format.
 
 The following rule 
 120 : propertyKey = requestDate = formatter = %d-%m-%Y 
 [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 
 is accepted and when checking with the D2W debugger I see the proper 
 formatter:
 
 PastedGraphic-1.png
 
 but when accepting the ajax date picker the date is shown in the order 
 Year-Month-Day (eg. 2014-12-23).
 
 Customer is complaining because this is the only place in the whole app 
 where the date format is wrong. All other
 places are ok.
 
 When looking at the bindings of ERD2WQueryDateRange everything looks ok, 
 formatter is properly referenced and bound
 to WOTextField dateformat.
 
 I must be missing something obvious - but WHAT???
 
 Thanks for any help
 ---markus---
 
 CU @ WOWODC15
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/flavio%40donadio.com.br
 
 This email sent to fla...@donadio.com.br
 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tedpet5%40yahoo.com
 
 This email sent to tedp...@yahoo.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: smart LIKE?

2015-02-04 Thread Ray Kiddy
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:22:21 +0100
OC o...@ocs.cz wrote:

 Hello there,
 
 I've just bumped into a need to fetch based on a textual qualifier
 which I can't create. My records in one column contain tab-separated
 pairs of tags and text, like in
 
 foo:foo valueTABbar:blahblahTABbax:this is the value of bax
 
 I need to fetch the rows whose value of given tag contains a string.
 
 If it were begins with, the solution would be a simple LIKE, but
 with contains, the problem is that e.g., LIKE '%foo%bax' would
 select the sample row above, although the value for 'foo' is 'foo
 value' and does not contain 'bax' at all.
 
 Is there some trick to do this at fetch with some smart qualifier (in
 FrontBase)? Or is there no better approach than to fetch all LIKE
 '%foo%bax' rows, and filter them further in memory e.g., using a
 regexp?
 
 Thanks a lot,
 OC
 

A few ideas.

MySQL has a regexp function that you can use in searches. Does
FrontBase also? If it is not too difficult to set up a qualifier using
that, it may work.

Also, it occurs to me that when I have had this problem, I sometimes
change the string to:

:foo:foo valueTABbar:blahblahTABbax:this is the value of bax:

The the regexp becomes simpler. There are no edge cases for the first
and last key-value pair.

It is too bad you cannot break those tags up into a table for the tags
themselves. That would make it all much easier.

- ray
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: limiting popupbutton list with a fetchSpec

2015-02-04 Thread Samuel Pelletier
Theodore,

I'm not familiar with D2W so my understanding of the rules is very basic.

Yes, the idea is to use sortedBooks as a list of possible book for a person. 

I would not compute it in awakeFromFetch though because it will be computed 
every time the EO is fetched even just to display it's name on a list. I would 
create a sortedBooks() method instead.

Samuel


 Le 2015-02-02 à 14:21, Theodore Petrosky tedp...@yahoo.com a écrit :
 
 Samuel,
 
 Ok this gets me in the ball park. In my person entity, I created in my Person 
 entity:
 
   NSArrayBook pertinentBooks = null;
   NSArrayBook sortedBooks = null;
 
 
   @Override
   public void awakeFromFetch(EOEditingContext editingContext) {
   // TODO Auto-generated method stub
   super.awakeFromFetch(editingContext);
 
   NSArrayShow shows = 
 PersonShow.SHOW.arrayValueInObject(personShows());
 
   @SuppressWarnings(unchecked)
   NSArrayBook showBooks = 
 ERXArrayUtilities.flatten(Show.BOOKS.arrayValueInObject(shows));
   
   pertinentBooks = 
 Book.INSTRUMENT_FAMILY.eq(this.instrumentFamily()).filtered(showBooks);
   
   sortedBooks = Book.BOOK_TITLE.ascs().sorted(pertinentBooks);
   }
 
 I put some logs and when a Person is edited, I can get the pertinentBooks 
 array in the person entity. But I have a toMany to BookPerson:
 
 100 : pageConfiguration = 'CreateEmbeddedBookPerson' = displayPropertyKeys = 
 (book,  isPrimaryPlayer) [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 100 : (pageConfiguration = 'CreateEmbeddedBookPerson' and propertyKey = 
 'book') = componentName = ERD2WEditToOneRelationship 
 [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 
 and of course:
 
 100 : (propertyType = 'r' and relationship.destinationEntity.name = 'Book') 
 = keyWhenRelationship = showBook [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 
 So I need the list of this relationship to be the sortedBooks from Person. Or 
 maybe send the sortedBooks array as the list element?
 
 
 On Feb 2, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Samuel Pelletier sam...@samkar.com 
 mailto:sam...@samkar.com wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I would do it in code in the person class using ERXKeys and let EOF do the 
 required fetched.
 
 // Get all shows for a person
 NSArrayShow shows = this.shows();
 
 // Get all book for the person shows, flatten is required because the 
 initial result is an array of array
 NSArrayBook showsBooks = 
 ERXArrayUtilities.flatten(Show.BOOKS.arrayValueInObject(shows));
 
 //Filter the book for the person Instrument
 NSArrayBook pertinentBooks = 
 Book.INSTRUMENT.eq(this.instrument()).filtered(showsBooks);
 
 // Sort the array before display
 NSArrayBook sortedBooks = Book.TITLE.ascs().sorted(pertinentBooks);
 
 Samuel
 
 
 Le 2015-01-29 à 09:12, Theodore Petrosky tedp...@yahoo.com 
 mailto:tedp...@yahoo.com a écrit :
 
 I have an Entity Person that has a toMany to Book.
 
 When I click the ‘new’ button in my EditRelationshipEmbeddedBookPerson I 
 want to limit the popupButton to only those books that this person should 
 see.
 
 The Person has an instrument. The Book has an instrument. so the popup list 
 should be only those books with the same instrument.
 
 But one layer deeper. a Person is assigned to one or many Shows. the Books 
 belong to a show. So if Person 1 only play one show and plays viola (I know 
 its a handicapped Person), the popup list only shows that one book as 
 available to assign.
 
 I don’t see how to create a fetch spec that i can pass in my Person and 
 limit the popup list.
 
 Am I clear? We could change the instrument if thinking its a Viola makes 
 one squeamish!
 
 Ted
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com 
 mailto:Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/samuel%40samkar.com 
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/samuel%40samkar.com
 
 This email sent to sam...@samkar.com
 
 

 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

[OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Ramsey Gurley
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx

The github is here

https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr

It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Troy Lumasag

Hey guys,

What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems 
being as it is now?

I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
1. porting issues(moving to future java versions)
2. single-threaded editing context - Must be a bottleneck problem for 
multiple instance setup?


Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha

--Troy

On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:

WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - 
especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening 
because it is a internal business advantage.

Tim Worman
UCLA GSEIS


On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC o...@ocs.cz wrote:

On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:

Apple cares about money, not us.

Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... 
oh, wait.

Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.

(i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by 
cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.

(ii) then they stop bundling it.

(iii) then they stop supporting it at all.

All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for 
licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put 
it to open source at the same moment?!?

The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to 
public (see Darwin).

Oh, sigh.

About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were the 
sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks pastime :)


- hugi




http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx

The github is here

https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr

It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz

This email sent to o...@ocs.cz


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com

This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com


  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmail.com

This email sent to tluma...@gmail.com


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Troy Lumasag
Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha *edit coz yeah I do not 
find it a problem.


--Troy

On 2/5/2015 2:14 PM, Troy Lumasag wrote:

Hey guys,

What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems 
being as it is now?

I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
1. porting issues(moving to future java versions)
2. single-threaded editing context - Must be a bottleneck problem for 
multiple instance setup?


Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha

--Troy

On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:
WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and 
quick - especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO 
seems threatening because it is a internal business advantage.


Tim Worman
UCLA GSEIS


On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC o...@ocs.cz wrote:

On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:

Apple cares about money, not us.
Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects 
licences... oh, wait.


Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it 
at all.


(i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application 
framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and 
thus half-unusable.


(ii) then they stop bundling it.

(iii) then they stop supporting it at all.

All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money 
for licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on 
earth not put it to open source at the same moment?!?


The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting 
things to public (see Darwin).


Oh, sigh.

About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is 
that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 
'varsity freaks pastime :)



- hugi



http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx 



The github is here

https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr

It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz

This email sent to o...@ocs.cz


___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com 



This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com


  ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmail.com 



This email sent to tluma...@gmail.com




___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Hugi Thordarson
Apple cares about money, not us.

- hugi



 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx
 
 The github is here
 
 https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
 
 It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread OC
On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
 Apple cares about money, not us.

Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... 
oh, wait.

Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.

(i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework by 
cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.

(ii) then they stop bundling it.

(iii) then they stop supporting it at all.

All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for 
licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put 
it to open source at the same moment?!?

The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to 
public (see Darwin).

Oh, sigh.

About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were the 
sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks pastime :)

 
 - hugi
 
 
 
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx
 
 The github is here
 
 https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
 
 It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz
 
 This email sent to o...@ocs.cz


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Musall Maik
Am 05.02.2015 um 07:14 schrieb Troy Lumasag tluma...@gmail.com:

 What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being 
 as it is now?
 I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:
 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions)
 2. single-threaded editing context - Must be a bottleneck problem for 
 multiple instance setup?

3. Only one database connection per snapshot cache. You only have the choice 
between multiple EOObjectStoreCoordinators, which mean separate snapshot caches 
which take up double the RAM and need to be synchronized, or accept that you 
only have one database connection, which is a PITA bottleneck.

Maik
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread OC
On 5. 2. 2015, at 7:14, Troy Lumasag tluma...@gmail.com wrote:

 What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being 
 as it is now?
 I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct:

0. no ObjC support. To get at least a remotely similar productivity, I've 
successfully managed to use Groovy with WO, but still it is a royal PITA; 
whilst Groovy is worlds better than Java, it's still far from ObjC.

 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions)
 2. single-threaded editing context - Must be a bottleneck problem for 
 multiple instance setup?

3. weird bugs the source of which it is quite difficult to find, without having 
an access to sources (or a support who has). I'm still rather anxious about the 
Case of Mysteriously Deleted EOs, see 
http://prod.lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2014/Nov/msg00163.html

 Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha
 
 --Troy
 
 On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote:
 WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - 
 especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening 
 because it is a internal business advantage.
 
 Tim Worman
 UCLA GSEIS
 
 On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC o...@ocs.cz wrote:
 
 On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
 Apple cares about money, not us.
 Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects 
 licences... oh, wait.
 
 Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.
 
 (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application 
 framework by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus 
 half-unusable.
 
 (ii) then they stop bundling it.
 
 (iii) then they stop supporting it at all.
 
 All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for 
 licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not 
 put it to open source at the same moment?!?
 
 The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to 
 public (see Darwin).
 
 Oh, sigh.
 
 About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were 
 the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks 
 pastime :)
 
 - hugi
 
 
 
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx
 
 The github is here
 
 https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
 
 It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz
 
 This email sent to o...@ocs.cz
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com
 
 This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com
 
  ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmail.com
 
 This email sent to tluma...@gmail.com
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz
 
 This email sent to o...@ocs.cz


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

ERD2WQueryDateRange ignores formatter??

2015-02-04 Thread Markus Ruggiero
Hi,

I have a problem getting ERD2WQueryDateRange to display the date in proper 
format.

The following rule 
120 : propertyKey = requestDate = formatter = %d-%m-%Y 
[com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]

is accepted and when checking with the D2W debugger I see the proper 
formatter:



but when accepting the ajax date picker the date is shown in the order 
Year-Month-Day (eg. 2014-12-23).

Customer is complaining because this is the only place in the whole app where 
the date format is wrong. All other
places are ok.

When looking at the bindings of ERD2WQueryDateRange everything looks ok, 
formatter is properly referenced and bound
to WOTextField dateformat.

I must be missing something obvious - but WHAT???

Thanks for any help
---markus---

CU @ WOWODC15 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: Is there a D2W input length limiting component?

2015-02-04 Thread Robert B. Hanviriyapunt
Don’t know anything in WONDER, but

Help with jQuery text box length counter
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4230432/help-with-jquery-text-box-length-counter

--
Robert B. Hanviriyapunt

 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:28:26 +0100
 From: Markus Ruggiero mailingli...@kataputt.com
 To: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
 Subject: Is there a D2W input length limiting component?
 Message-ID: 23b95d4e-15f7-447f-8a53-5ebaf65c8...@kataputt.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
 
 Before I try to create something on my own
 
 I need a text input that can limit the length of the text entered to eg 2000 
 chars and display a running counter so that the user knows immediately how 
 much he has left. 
 
 Is there something in (D2W) Wonder?
 
 Thanks for any pointer
 ---markus---
 
 CU @ WOWODC15
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: ERD2WQueryDateRange ignores formatter??

2015-02-04 Thread Flavio Donadio
Markus,


Whatever you're missing, I'm missing... Please, let me know if you ever find a 
solution to this problem.


Cheers,
Flavio


On 04/02/2015, at 11:56, Markus Ruggiero mailingli...@kataputt.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I have a problem getting ERD2WQueryDateRange to display the date in proper 
 format.
 
 The following rule 
 120 : propertyKey = requestDate = formatter = %d-%m-%Y 
 [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment]
 
 is accepted and when checking with the D2W debugger I see the proper 
 formatter:
 
 PastedGraphic-1.png
 
 but when accepting the ajax date picker the date is shown in the order 
 Year-Month-Day (eg. 2014-12-23).
 
 Customer is complaining because this is the only place in the whole app where 
 the date format is wrong. All other
 places are ok.
 
 When looking at the bindings of ERD2WQueryDateRange everything looks ok, 
 formatter is properly referenced and bound
 to WOTextField dateformat.
 
 I must be missing something obvious - but WHAT???
 
 Thanks for any help
 ---markus---
 
 CU @ WOWODC15
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/flavio%40donadio.com.br
 
 This email sent to fla...@donadio.com.br


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source

2015-02-04 Thread Timothy Worman
WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - 
especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening 
because it is a internal business advantage.

Tim Worman
UCLA GSEIS

 On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC o...@ocs.cz wrote:
 
 On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson h...@karlmenn.is wrote:
 Apple cares about money, not us.
 
 Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... 
 oh, wait.
 
 Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all.
 
 (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework 
 by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable.
 
 (ii) then they stop bundling it.
 
 (iii) then they stop supporting it at all.
 
 All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for 
 licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put 
 it to open source at the same moment?!?
 
 The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to 
 public (see Darwin).
 
 Oh, sigh.
 
 About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is that were 
 the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual 'varsity freaks 
 pastime :)
 
 
 - hugi
 
 
 
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-open-source.aspx
 
 The github is here
 
 https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr
 
 It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO.
 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz
 
 This email sent to o...@ocs.cz
 
 
 ___
 Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
 Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
 Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
 https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com
 
 This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com


 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list  (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com