Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-29 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi, Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-11-28 21:36: Bjoern I think that is where I think a centralized LDAP repository. if LDAP is currently in use then the user migration shouldnt be a problem at all. no, we don't use LDAP at the moment. Anyways, even if there was LDAP, migration of the actual

[libreoffice-website] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-28 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Bjoern I think that is where I think a centralized LDAP repository. if LDAP is currently in use then the user migration shouldnt be a problem at all. On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, bjoern wrote: > Hi, > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:19:59PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: > > I've only looked at Red

[libreoffice-website] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-28 Thread bjoern
Hi, On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:19:59PM -0500, Robinson Tryon wrote: > I've only looked at Redmine very briefly, but it does seem like an > interesting tool. RedMine looks very promising to me (I assume it to be at least as good as trac and I liked trac a lot) -- actually I dearly want to play wit

[libreoffice-website] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla replacement

2013-11-28 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Hey guys I would like to propose an alternative to bugzilla. > > Redmine, It supports multiple projects as well as integration with LDAP as > well as source control > > http://www.redmine.org > > I dunno if now would be a good time seein