Dear Charles,
> Subject: RE : RE: [libreoffice-website] [Drupal] The road ahead and missed
> opportunities
> From: charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
> To: website@libreoffice.org
>
> Dear Narayan,
>
> I would advise you read the minutes of the latest steerinh committee.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles.
I did read the minutes, thanks to the link provided by Michael.
I am not clear how a "statement" from SC made a way in the minutes. That's not
healthy.
Logically, I haven't seen any discussion at the mail list that can lead to this
conclusion.
It should be circulated well in advance in the agenda and discussed in the mail
beforehand, right?
The "statement" from SC reads like a commandment; to be followed by the
faithful.
Are we reduced (already) to a cult where the high priests decide everything?
Why can't we behave like an open community?
As I mentioned in other mail, irrespective of the CMS used, the central idea
was to create a second website that meets the strategic needs of the LibO
ecosystem (in particular, the 23 roles). That second site is named "Drupal"
just for convenience.
So when did the SC reverse its decision on this?
What's the new approach to achieve the same (or better) outcome?
The Drupal initiative does not hinder any of the current activities.
Neither does it divert any of the volunteers away.
So what's the problem?
Regards,
Narayan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
