Hi David,
thanks for the try ... although I know that time is running :-)
(Now here comes my famous) But ...
Am Montag, den 24.01.2011, 11:09 +0800 schrieb David Nelson:
Hi Christoph, :-)
I'm sorry, friend, but I've just been talking with Narayan about the
options, and what you are
believe that this is the get things DONE phase. After the
release, we will easily switch to get things RIGHT mode.
Hope everyone agrees.
Back to work, now- everyone! There's no time to lose! :)
-Narayan
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] Thanks and Thoughts (was: Re:
[libreoffice-design] UX
Hi, :-)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:46, Narayan Aras narayana...@hotmail.com wrote:
David and I believe that this is the get things DONE phase. After the
release, we will easily switch to get things RIGHT mode.
Hope everyone agrees.
Back to work, now- everyone! There's no time to lose! :)
Hi David,
almost at work, thus just a: sorry for sounding that strong, of course the
current site is amazing given the available time - I'd like that even more
people can enjoy it's content perceiving it a breeze. So I am happy about the
status, and let's talk when things settled a bit.
Now,
such
deliberate repetition is unavoidable.
@location of why pages:
Logically, the reader should come across why Libreoffice right AFTER what is
LibreOffice?.
So we may have to rearrange this. David?
Regards,
Narayan
Subject: [libreoffice-website] Thanks and Thoughts (was: Re:
[libreoffice-design
have to rearrange this. David?
Regards,
Narayan
Subject: [libreoffice-website] Thanks and Thoughts (was: Re:
[libreoffice-design] UX/Visual Design Description (Draft) [...])
From: christ...@dogmatux.com
To: website@libreoffice.org
CC: des...@libreoffice.org
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011
Hi Christoph, :-)
I'm sorry, friend, but I've just been talking with Narayan about the
options, and what you are suggesting would involve re-designing the
whole IA. It will mess up everything and cause us numerous other
problems to solve in other places.
And, honestly, I don't really agree with
