On 07/02/2015 08:34 PM, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'm looking for your feedback.
a) Can you create a category for Colour Palettes, Hatching Palettes,
and the rest of the objects that live in ~/config.
This is for extensions such as Parabolic Colour Palette.
(I thought that there was one that
I have no idea who wrote what, so I'm not attributing anything to anybody:
> Maybe all extensions that aren't tested
Who is going to do the testing?
It takes me at least 15 minutes to test an extension, if I know how it
is supposed to work, and have the appropriate locale installed.
If I don't
My recommendation would be to remove _all_ extensions provided by Devart
from the LibreOffice Extension website, and permanently ban them from
contributing anything to the project.
I don't object to commercially distributed licenses.
I don't object to developers that are selling Open Source
Infrastructure Team:
Posting here, because I'm being lazy, and not filing this on RedMine.
This is really frustrating.Most of the time the steps described below
result in an error message, but it works as expected frequently enough,
that I still do it.
I couldn't find anything at
Norbert wrote:
>Done. these bogus 'extensions' are now removed
Until you pointed it out, I didn't realize that nothing in the install
directory was an OXT file.
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 17/08/2016 22:45, m.a.riosv wrote:
> I informed also about this matter, end of July.
>
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Doubs-about-some-extensions-td4189260.html
Thanks.
I remembered reading emails about mislabelled extensions, but thought
that they had been removed.
jonathon
--
On 13/11/2016 00:15, Tom wrote:
> frustrating question that does NOT fit in any FAQ or other program type Help
> areas!
> I was very disappointed to find nothing but a few useless templates
It is more than a little disconcerting to see the "Inglenook and
TimeSaver Puzzle" at the top of the