On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
Hi,
I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org's front page.
The Installation requirements section concerns me most. I've quoted the
current text below and my suggestions for cleaning it up. Are these
On 05/23/2012 09:50 AM, Elad Alfassa wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org's front page.
The Installation
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
How about 400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better
Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we
are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we
support.
64-bit
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
How about 400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better
Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we
are still trying to figure
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
How about 400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better
Since we now offer 64bit by
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended
specs, not the minimal.
Ahh okay, so here's the revision:
Recommended installation
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 20:27 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended
specs, not the minimal.
Ahh okay, so here's the revision:
Recommended installation
