The status of the issue: `Modular Server page` of project: `fedora-websites`
has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by robyduck.
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/735
___
websites mailing list -- websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
This is an old plan, new modularity will get live tomorrow, Closing this as
fixed anyway, although in another ticket.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/735
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I have some questions and woud like to organize this a bit, because e don't
have much time. I'll add people to the single questions, hoping you will reply
;)
* @langdon are Modular Server images to treat like other ISO files? So
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
We are ready to go ahead towards Modular Server now.
I made a new *modular-server* branch where we should work on, will build it
also in staging to show you how things look like.
**Note**: please file a PR at least for the first
pfrields added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Might not be a bad idea to make a special branch now, iff. it's not
troublesome. The regular Beta release was still at risk yesterday, although the
outlook is better this week for sure.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
No there is no specific branch for now, I thought to branch directly at Beta
release date, so we have an already merged beta F27 Beta branch. If this is
going to be too far away due to other Beta slips, we can branch anytime.
``
To
pfrields added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@mattdm and @langdon: Something that would help here would be new testimonials
from either developers or users of the new Modular Server. I realize there's
not a huge group of folks to tap for this, but the point is our existing
pfrields added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Adding @codeblock to this issue as well; he said he'd be able to help. So is
there a specific branch we should use now for building up the changes we want
to deploy after F27 Beta releases?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
So it seems we are going towards a ad hoc release cycle for Modular Server,
which even went through the Server SIG today. Please take note of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Langdon/Proposed_Modular_Server_Release
That means we
robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@mattdm cool !!
I'm adding here some more informations of what the plan would be to get the
pages live from now to F27 GA.
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1775#comment-466045
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I will also help with some copywriting.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/735
___
websites mailing list --
11 matches
Mail list logo
