[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] resend: need Code Review for Lighttpd 1.4 integration

2008-04-22 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Tue Apr 22 01:02:26 2008 >> - Why does it need "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/lib", that seems odd? >> > >This was done as a temporary measure to get round the mysql_config >--libs problem. Basically it needs to find libcrun in the linker library

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Reminder: CR 6665970 (memcached 1.2.5) - Code Review Request

2008-03-13 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Thu Mar 13 17:44:17 2008 >In memcached/install-sfw, you're copying the rbac (not smf, btw) files into >place, even though you don't completely own them. Mike, is this okay with >you? It seems like this should be done in a more common location. I ha

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] CR 6665970 (memcached 1.2.5) - Code Review Request

2008-03-12 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Wed Mar 12 05:57:19 2008 >Running checkproto on my workspace gives the following output: > >error: SUNWmemcached: hardlink to non-existent file: >usr/lib/memcached=/usr/lib/isaexec >warning: SUNWmemcachedr: duplicate entry for etc/security/auth_attr

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] webrev review requested for the various miscellaneous PHP5 features

2007-11-26 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From roland.mainz at nrubsig.org Mon Nov 26 16:34:41 2007 >> me... but while I would like things to be as consistent as they >> can be (because todays's maintainer of the foo package may not be >> tomorrow's) I'm not really interested in going to meetings about shell >> style. > >Would you be int

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] webrev review requested for the various miscellaneous PHP5 features

2007-11-26 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Mon Nov 26 15:50:11 2007 >> If not, we >> should discuss and decide on one. > >Ok... >... who is the gatekeeper for SFWNV ? me... but while I would like things to be as consistent as they can be (because todays's maintainer of the foo package may not

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] diffs in CRs [Re: WebRTI: ....]

2007-11-13 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Tue Nov 13 21:16:20 2007 >Mike.Sullivan at sun.com wrote: >> >> BTW please go make sure to fill out the suggested fix for each bug, >> I looked at two and saw none. While it would be best to put the >> fix for each bug only in that bug, if you can't i

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Webrevs for Review: Ruby Integration.

2007-11-05 Thread mike.sulli...@sun.com
>From sfwnv-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org Mon Nov 5 12:52:26 2007 >Shanti > Well, there seems to be a bit of disconnect here. Sun Studio Compiler >folks consistently recommend us to use '-fast' compiler option but at >the same time folks reviewing our integration within SXDE give a >consi