Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Thinking about XML, it occurred to me that representing MK models in
>XML might not be best -- it almost makes sense to put the models in
>the form of DTDs (though I don't know how explicit a DTD can be about
>details like ints/floats/dates/etc).
What abo
Thinking about XML, it occurred to me that representing MK models in
XML might not be best -- it almost makes sense to put the models in
the form of DTDs (though I don't know how explicit a DTD can be about
details like ints/floats/dates/etc).
Anyway, I was thinking about how a set of XML records