Martin,
I'm in the middle of doing a similar migration. One thing I have
found so far:
- If your app supports any sort of file upload, you'll need to get
the most up-to-date version of WebKit.HTTPServer from svn
It used to read the entire file into memory, which was deadly for any
sort
Hello,
I've had great success deploying WebKit with mod_webkit and Apache, but
my administrator wants me to switch to WebKits built-in httpd and
mod_proxy/mod_rewrite.
What does this mean for performance / stability of the application? Any
experiences? Assesments?
I've searched the archives a
Bug submitted.
On Sep 28, 2004, at 10:40, Ian Bicking wrote:
Samuel M.Smith wrote:
Thanks, at least I know that someone is watching this list.
As my post indicated, I found the same work around after a couple of
hours of trying.
The point of my post is so the developers know there is a bug so the
Samuel M.Smith wrote:
Thanks, at least I know that someone is watching this list.
As my post indicated, I found the same work around after a couple of
hours of trying.
The point of my post is so the developers know there is a bug so they
can fix it or at least mention it in the official document
I have had trouble when there is both an index.html and an index.psp
file in the same folder. I just avoid it.
-ww
On Sep 27, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Samuel M.Smith wrote:
This is the second time I have posted this message. I have not gotten
any messages from this list since I signed up other than th
Thanks, at least I know that someone is watching this list.
As my post indicated, I found the same work around after a couple of
hours of trying.
The point of my post is so the developers know there is a bug so they
can fix it or at least mention it in the official documentation so that
future u
I have had trouble when there is both an index.html and an index.psp
file in the same folder. I just avoid it.
-ww
On Sep 27, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Samuel M.Smith wrote:
This is the second time I have posted this message. I have not gotten
any messages from this list since I signed up other than th
This is the second time I have posted this message. I have not gotten
any messages from this list since I signed up other than the one I
posted.
Is this list effectively dead?
Is there another list where I can ask this question?
Sam
have mod_webkit version 0.8.1 installed on Mac OS X Server 1
I have mod_webkit version 0.8.1 installed on Mac OS X Server 10.3.5
with Apache (not apache 2)
For one of my virtual hosts in its VirtualHost block I have the
following block
AddType text/psp .psp
AddHandler psp-handler .psp
WKServer localhost 8086
SetHandler webkit-handler
k into it.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:00 PM
To: 'Jay Love'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Webware-devel] mod_webkit for Apache2
I just checked in some fixes that make this compile cleanly and work
proper
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Webware-devel] mod_webkit for Apache2
>
>
>
> I've committed an initial version of mod_webkit for apache2.
> It's in the
> Adapters/mod_webkit2 directory.
>
> It works for me. Y'all give it a try.
>
> CAVEAT: On redhat 8,
I've committed an initial version of mod_webkit for apache2. It's in the
Adapters/mod_webkit2 directory.
It works for me. Y'all give it a try.
CAVEAT: On redhat 8, it appears that the httpd-devel rpm packages are
messed up. I had to build a fresh apache2 from source to get to the
point where
Ian Bicking wrote:
> To experiment with the feature set, as opposed to the actual speed, it
> might be best to start with WebKit.cgi (or probably just Adapter.py),
> and then port to mod_webkit. Actually, it might work okay for speed
> too, since you'd still have balancing -- the front box would
To experiment with the feature set, as opposed to the actual speed, it
might be best to start with WebKit.cgi (or probably just Adapter.py),
and then port to mod_webkit. Actually, it might work okay for speed
too, since you'd still have balancing -- the front box would just have
to be beefier.
T
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 12:21, Bobby Kuzma wrote:
> Is there anyone actively working on reworking mod_webkit to support multiple
> AppServer instances, as described in the Wiki. I'd like to try implimenting
> it, but I don't want to step on anyone elses toes in doing so.
I did a patch to mod_webkit
Is there anyone actively working on reworking mod_webkit to support multiple
AppServer instances, as described in the Wiki. I'd like to try implimenting
it, but I don't want to step on anyone elses toes in doing so.
Thanks,
Bobby Kuzma
Senior Software Engineer | Internet Systems Adminstrator
USA
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> Looks to me like mod_backhand is a load-balancing proxy
> module. So it would
> require WebKit to be an HTTP server. But if WebKit is an
> HTTP server, then
> you don't need mod_backhand at all, unless you need it for the
> load-balancing features. You could just use
Terrel Shumway wrote:
> Another option, probably easier in both the short run and the
> long run,
> is to find another similar module like mod_backhand that has already
> been ported, and write another adapter to connect to it:
> pro:
> let someone else maintain the icky C part,
>
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 17:44, Dave Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
>
> Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
>
> If so, where can I get it?
>
> I was using Apache 1.3.24 but had trouble with SSL under windows. I could only get
>SSL
Let me be the first to point out that I need this to be a Windows binary! :-)
I run Windows 2K.
Sorry about that,
Dave Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
>
> Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
>
> If so, where can I get it?
>
> I
Hi,
I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
If so, where can I get it?
I was using Apache 1.3.24 but had trouble with SSL under windows. I could only get
SSL working with 2.0.35.
If its not compiled for Apache 2.0 yet, how
On Saturday 08 December 2001 06:07 am, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> On Friday December 07, 2001 04:43 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:04 pm, Love, Jay wrote:
> > > From memory, with cgi, if there is a location header, a redirect
> > > is assumed. With mod_webkit, you n
On Friday December 07, 2001 04:43 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:04 pm, Love, Jay wrote:
> > From memory, with cgi, if there is a location header, a redirect is
> > assumed. With mod_webkit, you need to set the response code, I think.
>
> Yipee! That was it. Thanks,
On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:04 pm, Love, Jay wrote:
> From memory, with cgi, if there is a location header, a redirect is
> assumed. With mod_webkit, you need to set the response code, I think.
Yipee! That was it. Thanks, Jay.
def _respond(self, trans):
trans.response
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Webware-devel] mod_webkit bug?
>
>
> The following redirect works with OneShot.cgi, but not with
> mod_webkit:
>
>
> from WebKit.HTTPServlet import HTTPServlet
>
> class Main(HTTPServlet):
>
> def
On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:28 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> To rephrase my question, where is the fake 'Status' header set by
> HTTPResponse translated into a real HTTP response code header?
>
> > Since a raw response contains the headers in a clearly delimited
> > fashion, there should be no hang
On Thursday 06 December 2001 11:08, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:11 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> > This brings up a question I've been meaning to ask about
> > adapters. Do they set the HTTP response header or is that the
> > responsiblity of the AppServer, Response, etc?
On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:11 pm, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> This brings up a question I've been meaning to ask about adapters.
> Do they set the HTTP response header or is that the responsiblity of
> the AppServer, Response, etc? I couldn't find any code, where they
> do this, but I also couldn'
This brings up a question I've been meaning to ask about adapters.
Do they set the HTTP response header or is that the responsiblity of
the AppServer, Response, etc? I couldn't find any code, where they
do this, but I also couldn't find anywhere that AppServer or
HTTPResponse do it either.
The following redirect works with OneShot.cgi, but not with mod_webkit:
from WebKit.HTTPServlet import HTTPServlet
class Main(HTTPServlet):
def _respond(self, trans):
trans.response().setHeader("Location", "Home")
def respondToGet(self, trans):
At 04:59 PM 10/3/2001 -0700, Russell Blank wrote:
>Does anyone have a binary for Apache for Windows?
I'll upload the copy Jay gave me to the Webware site and announce it on
webware-discuss (tonight).
-Chuck
___
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
Does anyone have a binary for Apache for Windows?
Russell A. Blank
Senior Consultant
Atlas Development Corporation
6351 Owensmouth Avenue, #101
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
(818) 340-7080 Phone
(818) 340-7079 Fax
"May all our hearts go out to the victims of the most recent act of war."
__
Hello,
While packaging mod_webkit for Debian installation I've added an info
file to ease installation with Apache. (See attached file)
The post install script includes the following lines:
apacheconf=/etc/apache/httpd.conf
if ! grep -q "^WKServer" $apacheconf; then
echo >>$apacheconf "WKSe
At 10:04 AM 6/24/2001 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> -o mod_webkit.so marshal.o mod_webkit.o
>apxs:Break: Command failed with rc=255
I tried on a Linux box that I knew to work. The diff is that the working
box had a "gcc -shared" preceding the "-o mod_webkit..." line above. So I
did this b
I'm trying to build mod_webkit from CVS on a FreeBSD 4.3 freshly installed
box with Apache 1.3.20:
sa1# make APXS=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs -o mod_webkit.so -cmod_webkit.c marshal.c
gcc -funsigned-char -DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite
-DNO_DL_NEEDED -I/usr/local/
35 matches
Mail list logo
