On 08 Jun 2001 20:16:32 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
>
> B.T.W. take a look at www.python.de, there is some
> surprise about Webware, but it's not finished yet.
> I need a stable AsyncThreadedHTTPServer,
> because I have no Apache on the uCSimm.
> Unfortunately it does not seem to run stable.
> I
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>
> At 08:59 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> >yes I know, but having the smallest Web Appliction on earth
> >would be quite something...
> >
> > > If you look at the "AppServer" script in CVS, you will see that the new
> > > default app server is ThreadedAppServe
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:18:28PM -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 12:06 PM 6/8/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >One issue would be getting the content manager's editor to
> >syntax-highlight the template in HTML style. (nedit does this, BTW,
> >even while highlighting the Python parts as Pytho
At 03:35 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>I think he's looking for a pure-python standalone HTTP server like
>AsyncThreadedHTTPServer.
Oh, got it.
So that would be facilitated by our decision to have AppServer handle
multiple ports and protocols.
-Chuck
_
At 03:17 PM 6/8/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>At 08:59 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
>>yes I know, but having the smallest Web Appliction on earth
>>would be quite something...
>>
>> > If you look at the "AppServer" script in CVS, you will see that the new
>> > default app server is
At 12:06 PM 6/8/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>One issue would be getting the content manager's editor to
>syntax-highlight the template in HTML style. (nedit does this, BTW,
>even while highlighting the Python parts as Python.) A bigger issue
>would be content managers who want to use visual edit
At 08:59 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
>yes I know, but having the smallest Web Appliction on earth
>would be quite something...
>
> > If you look at the "AppServer" script in CVS, you will see that the new
> > default app server is ThreadedAppServer.
> >
> > Whether or not that makes an
On Friday 08 June 2001 11:39, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> >Hmmm, that sounds about right. So long as it also makes
> >a backup of any existing .py files with the same
> > basename.
>
> How about this instead: it only replaces the .py file if
> it was itself autogenerated. The servlet factories could
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:20:16AM -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
> Yep, it does and Geoff's right - compiling isn't Pythonic.
> Mike's approach is perfectly valid and very easy, but it could
> still scare non-programmers. It's been one of our intentions
> all along to make it dead simple for non-pro
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>
> At 08:16 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> >B.T.W. take a look at www.python.de, there is some
> >surprise about Webware, but it's not finished yet.
> >I need a stable AsyncThreadedHTTPServer,
> >because I have no Apache on the uCSimm.
> >Unfortunately it does
Geoff Talvola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That would be fairly Pythonic in the same way that .pyc's
> > > are handled. Especially if there were no complaints when
> > > write access wasn't available.
> >
> >Hmmm, that sounds about right. So long as it also makes
> >a backup of any existing .
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 02:01:04PM -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> >If I already had a set of modules and was adding a page, I would not make
> >a .tmpl file and run TScompile on it. Instead, I would copy an existing
> >module and modify it.
>
> That sounds fine, as long as the "copy an existing m
At 11:36 AM 6/8/01 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>On Friday 08 June 2001 11:22, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> > At 02:17 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> > >- PSP could do the same thing as TemplateServer -- just
> > > write out the .py file into the same directory as the
> > > PSP, with the same
On Friday 08 June 2001 11:22, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 02:17 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> >- PSP could do the same thing as TemplateServer -- just
> > write out the .py file into the same directory as the
> > PSP, with the same filename and class name. That
> > requires write acc
At 02:17 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>- PSP could do the same thing as TemplateServer -- just write out the .py
>file into the same directory as the PSP, with the same filename and class
>name. That requires write access.
That would be fairly Pythonic in the same way that .pyc's ar
At 08:16 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
>B.T.W. take a look at www.python.de, there is some
>surprise about Webware, but it's not finished yet.
>I need a stable AsyncThreadedHTTPServer,
>because I have no Apache on the uCSimm.
>Unfortunately it does not seem to run stable.
>I have to use
At 10:55 AM 6/8/01 -0700, Tavis Rudd wrote:
>Geoff,
>you've got a good point. If we could sort out the import
>logic needed to get #extend working properly with .tmpl files
>and @extend working with .psp files that would be ideal.
It might be a bit of a mess in the case of PSP because the genera
On Friday 08 June 2001 11:05, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> At 02:01 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> >OK, I misunderstood. I thought the compile step would
> > be something you'd have to run repeatedly. I guess I
> > really shouldn't comment on TemplateServer without at
> > least reading t
At 02:01 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>OK, I misunderstood. I thought the compile step would be something you'd
>have to run repeatedly. I guess I really shouldn't comment on
>TemplateServer without at least reading the docs :-)
Yeah, but now it appears according to Tavis' earlier
At 10:46 AM 6/8/01 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:31:24PM -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> > > Write a template *.tmpl
> > > Run TScompile, which creates *.py servlets. Each servlet
> contains
> >
> > But I would
> > strongly urge you to reconsider this. Having
Geoff Talvola wrote:
>
> At 10:19 AM 6/8/01 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > > ServletFactory.py and PlateKit have gone! Hope they come
> > > back...
> >
> >They were removed because they overlap with TScompile but are less
> >flexible.
On Friday 08 June 2001 10:46, Mike Orr wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:31:24PM -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> > > Write a template *.tmpl
> > > Run TScompile, which creates *.py servlets.
> > > Each servlet contains
> >
> > But I would
> > strongly urge you to reconsider this.
Geoff,
you've got a good point. If we could sort out the import
logic needed to get #extend working properly with .tmpl files
and @extend working with .psp files that would be ideal.
The generated code for #extend Templates.SkeletonPage could
be:
try
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:31:24PM -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
> > Write a template *.tmpl
> > Run TScompile, which creates *.py servlets. Each servlet contains
>
> But I would
> strongly urge you to reconsider this. Having no separate compilation step
> is one of the really n
At 10:19 AM 6/8/01 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> > ServletFactory.py and PlateKit have gone! Hope they come
> > back...
>
>They were removed because they overlap with TScompile but are less
>flexible. The paradigm now is:
> Write
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote:
> ServletFactory.py and PlateKit have gone! Hope they come
> back...
They were removed because they overlap with TScompile but are less
flexible. The paradigm now is:
Write a template *.tmpl
Run TScompile, which crea
26 matches
Mail list logo
