RE: [Webware-devel] Re: Session invalidate

2001-08-13 Thread Love, Jay
No, I just didn't think of it. > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Esterbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 8:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Session invalidate > > > At 08:04 PM 8/12/2001 -

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Session invalidate

2001-08-12 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
At 08:04 PM 8/12/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote: >Done. > >I also added dictionary style access to Session. Also, >Application.isSessionIdProblematic wasn't checking the session objects >timeout and was using the default configuration setting. I fixed that. > >Jay Is there any reason to do this:

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Session invalidate

2001-08-12 Thread Jay Love
Done. I also added dictionary style access to Session. Also, Application.isSessionIdProblematic wasn't checking the session objects timeout and was using the default configuration setting. I fixed that. Jay Clark C . Evans wrote: >In the current CVS snapshot, session.invalidate() is still

[Webware-devel] Re: Session invalidate

2001-08-12 Thread Clark C . Evans
In the current CVS snapshot, session.invalidate() is still unimplemented. The stuff below looks resonable to me, I was wondering if it could be added? Best, Clark - Forwarded message from David O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "David O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL