Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Tavis Rudd
Drew, STML looks interesting! There's some ideas in there that would benefit Cheetah (www.cheetahtemplate.org) and probably vice versa. It'll be interesting to get STML running with Webware as well. You should ask Chuck to add a link to it on his 'Templates Summary' page: http://webware.sou

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Drew Csillag
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:37:39AM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > Drew Csillag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another thing for SkunkWeb performance. You want to turn off > > userModuleCleanup. If on, it clears out any modules that were loaded > > during the course of processing the request, which

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Drew Csillag
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 12:29:17PM -0400, Drew Csillag wrote: > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > > Drew Csillag wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > > > > Tavis Rudd wrote: > > > > > > > > > All of this is true, but th

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Drew Csillag
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > Drew Csillag wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > > > Tavis Rudd wrote: > > > > > > > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven. > > > > There are many factors involved and r

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Schwaller
Drew Csillag wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > > Tavis Rudd wrote: > > > > > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven. > > > There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks > > > are needed before such a statement can be made. > >

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Drew Csillag
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Tom Schwaller wrote: > Tavis Rudd wrote: > > > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven. > > There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks > > are needed before such a statement can be made. > > I did some Apache benchmarks (w

Re: [Skunkweb-list] Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Drew Csillag
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 08:20:09PM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3) You write: > > "WebWare uses a threaded model. While in some ways makes > > things simpler, it makes many things more complicated. > > Also, because of the Python global interpreter lock,

Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Schwaller
Tavis Rudd wrote: > All of this is true, but the final statement is unproven. > There are many factors involved and realistic benchmarks > are needed before such a statement can be made. I did some Apache benchmarks (with ab) with more ore less static pages. Webware was much faster than SkunkWe

Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-26 Thread Jack Moffitt
> at a time. SkunkWeb uses a forking process model, which > makes resource sharing more complicated in certain > circumstances, it will fully utilize all available > processors,"... "so SkunkWeb scales better." In two and a half years of working on icecast, we've been doign threads almost

Re: [Webware-devel] corrections to the Skunkweb FAQ

2001-08-26 Thread Ian Bicking
Tavis Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) You write: > "WebWare uses a threaded model. While in some ways makes > things simpler, it makes many things more complicated. > Also, because of the Python global interpreter lock, if you > have more than 1 CPU, WebWare won't actually use very much,