Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> Looks to me like mod_backhand is a load-balancing proxy
> module. So it would
> require WebKit to be an HTTP server. But if WebKit is an
> HTTP server, then
> you don't need mod_backhand at all, unless you need it for the
> load-balancing features. You could just use
Terrel Shumway wrote:
> Another option, probably easier in both the short run and the
> long run,
> is to find another similar module like mod_backhand that has already
> been ported, and write another adapter to connect to it:
> pro:
> let someone else maintain the icky C part,
>
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 17:44, Dave Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
>
> Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
>
> If so, where can I get it?
>
> I was using Apache 1.3.24 but had trouble with SSL under windows. I could only get
>SSL
Let me be the first to point out that I need this to be a Windows binary! :-)
I run Windows 2K.
Sorry about that,
Dave Rogers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
>
> Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
>
> If so, where can I get it?
>
> I
Hi,
I have the need to use mod_webkit with Apache 2.0.35.
Has anyone compiled this to work with Apache 2.0.35?
If so, where can I get it?
I was using Apache 1.3.24 but had trouble with SSL under windows. I could only get
SSL working with 2.0.35.
If its not compiled for Apache 2.0 yet, how
