Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
[My patch to Application with respect to virtual resources.]
> This actually doesn't handle virtual resources. Unlike mod_python,
> URLParser adds the extension itself, so it has to have a filesystem to
> search. The assumption of a file is carrie
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 04:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know that this is "done and dusted" already, but I also think that this is
> a great idea. You may have seen a patch I submitted which attempts to allow
> Webware contexts to have "virtual resources" in much the same way that
> mod_python do
Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ian Bicking wrote:
> >
> > If caching wasn't done in the factory, I think it should be. I think
> > that just means we have to have a method to return the servlet to the
> > factory, and then the factory can keep a pool of servlets.
>
> I ag
On 28 Jul 2003 23:35:39 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 22:54, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
>> Really, if caching will be generally implemented I think it still
>> belongs in servlet factories. I think the right way to do that
>> would be to move some of what I've put in PythonServletFac
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 22:54, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Really, if caching will be generally implemented I think it still
> belongs in servlet factories. I think the right way to do that would be
> to move some of what I've put in PythonServletFactory into
> ServletFactory, and use a different method in
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 22:17, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:34:04 -0400, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> >> If caching wasn't done in the factory, I think it should be. I
> >> think that just means we have to have a method to return the
> >> servlet to the factory, and then the facto
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:34:04 -0400, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
>> If caching wasn't done in the factory, I think it should be. I
>> think that just means we have to have a method to return the
>> servlet to the factory, and then the factory can keep a pool of
>> servlets.
>>
> I agree -- the cachin
Ian Bicking wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 10:32, Aaron Held wrote:
>> In the CVS version it looks like the the servlets are created for
>> each request.
>
> I'm not sure if this was ever the behavior, though I always thought it
> was too. ServletFactory.py:181 is where the caching is done. The
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 10:32, Aaron Held wrote:
> In the CVS version it looks like the the servlets are created for each
> request.
I'm not sure if this was ever the behavior, though I always thought it
was too. ServletFactory.py:181 is where the caching is done. The
servlet *class* is cached, b
