Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-23 Thread Andreas Poisel
* Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060423 18:50]: > Ok, I have already changed the MakeAppWorkDir script. If the working dir > does already exist, then all missing subdirectories and files will be > created, and access permissions set, but without overwriting any > existing files. I thi

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-23 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
> I can allow running on an existing working dir, but how should > MakeAppWorkDir behave if the config files or the launcher script > already exist? Overwrite or keep (there could be some customization > in the config files and launcher script already)? Maybe we can add > an option --overwrite, bu

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-22 Thread Mark Phillips
On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: That's an important feedback since I've run and tested Webware only on Linux, Win and Solaris :-) It would be also interesting to know whether mod_webkit runs on Mac OS (which has a built in Apache server, right)? Yes. I have Apache2

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-22 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Mark Phillips wrote: FWIW, today I downloaded the 0.9.1b1 and installed it on Mac OS X 10.4.6 running python 2.4. Ran through the tests without a hitch. Set up a working directory, added my app files, and fired it up also without a blip. That's an important feedback since I've run and tested W

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-22 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Andreas Poisel wrote: Just one minor issue: starting with a 0.9pre release (if I remember correctly) the MakeAppWorkDir.py script refused to write the application skeleton when the target directory already existed. I used to check out e.g. the "MyApp" directory from version control and webware-

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-21 Thread Andreas Poisel
* Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060421 18:40]: > Since I did not get much feedback, I'm going to release 0.9.1 final this > weekend if nobody objects. I'm using 0.9.1 beta in productive environment without problems. Just one minor issue: starting with a 0.9pre release (if I remember

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-21 Thread Mark Phillips
On Apr 21, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: Since I did not get much feedback, I'm going to release 0.9.1 final this weekend if nobody objects. FWIW, today I downloaded the 0.9.1b1 and installed it on Mac OS X 10.4.6 running python 2.4. Ran through the tests without a hitch. Set

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-21 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Since I did not get much feedback, I'm going to release 0.9.1 final this weekend if nobody objects. -- Christoph --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technolo

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-07 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
I have just implemented a solution to the ImportSpy problem. ImportSpy used ihooks to track imported modules, in order to reload those modules with AutoReloadingAppServer. The problem was that using ihooks could raise problems if you used Cheetah templates or imported modules like Kid from zip

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-02 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On 4/2/06, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > The polling could go into a 0.9.2. One problem that has vexed Webware > > is that releases go weeks or even months without getting released so > > one more thing can be added. In the mean time, people download t

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-02 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Chuck Esterbrook wrote: The polling could go into a 0.9.2. One problem that has vexed Webware is that releases go weeks or even months without getting released so one more thing can be added. In the mean time, people download the old release and miss all the good stuff that's sitting in the repos

Re: [Webware-devel] New release?

2006-04-01 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On 4/1/06, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since a couple of bugs have been fixed in the last months and a nice > Ajax example was added, I think it is time for making a new 0.9.1 > release. However, one thing I would like to have in the new release is > the (optional) use of polli