Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: MK potential bug fix)

2002-03-16 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On Friday 15 March 2002 11:32 pm, Tripp Lilley wrote: > I tend to rewrite things every 6-9 months, anyway, just to fuck with > myself. I'd rather rewrite than maintain, any day :) Must be nice to have that kind of free time. :-) Well you've beened warned 4 times in 4 messages... Mwuhahahahaha!

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: MK potential bug fix)

2002-03-15 Thread Tripp Lilley
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Mike Orr wrote: > Just keep in mind that properties themselves might change, and then > you'll have to update your application again. The same for slots and > the super() call. The developers themselves aren't fully satisfied with > the current APIs, and the features haven'

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: MK potential bug fix)

2002-03-15 Thread Mike Orr
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:11:23PM -0500, Tripp Lilley wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > > BUT Python 2.2 has more caveats about its new features than I can fit > > in my head. It also has some bugs that have been mentioned on their > > site, but I don't remember them off

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: MK potential bug fix)

2002-03-15 Thread Tripp Lilley
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Tavis Rudd wrote: > I hope you'll wait until the properties thing is implemented a bit > better in Python, and without all the caveats. I started > implementing a version of the experimental webware codebase I'm > working that used properties, but it was a nightmare. It bro

Re: [Webware-devel] Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: MK potential bug fix)

2002-03-15 Thread Tavis Rudd
On Friday 15 March 2002 19:51, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > Also, I plan that a future version of Webware would use the > attributes/properties style rather than the current all-methods > style. Such a change would come with a script to update existing > sites. We have, of course, big juicy projects