[Webware-devel] [ webware-Patches-666560 ] Let non reletive urls work in forward() and includeURL()

2003-01-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #666560, was opened at 2003-01-11 23:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=666560&group_id=4866 Category: WebKit Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luke Holden (lholden) >Assigned to: Stuart Donal

Re: [Webware-devel] includeURL bug?

2003-01-12 Thread Stuart Donaldson
What should the behavior of the relative URL code be? forward() includeURL() and callMethodOfServlet() all do something very similar and result in calling request.setURLPath(). Should root be the root of the context? Should root be the root of the adapter? (ie: you can specify another cont

[Webware-devel] [ webware-Patches-666560 ] Let non reletive urls work in forward() and includeURL()

2003-01-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #666560, was opened at 2003-01-11 23:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=666560&group_id=4866 Category: WebKit Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luke Holden (lholden) Assigned to: Stuart Donald

Re: [Webware-devel] includeURL bug?

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Check out how Apache Tomcat, and Apache Turbine handles this stuff... Specifically... look at the RequestDispatcher interface: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/servletapi/javax/servlet/RequestDispatcher.html and the code that implement

[Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So far... I really do enjoy using webware and python to create my web applications. One of the things I love about webware... is that it allows me to design my applications in much the same way I would using Apache Turbine... But with webware thing

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Edmund Lian
On 01/12/2003 09:28:43 PM Luke wrote: >Of course, I have looked into Cheetah for handling issue number 1. But ah... >the lack of dynamic recompilation is a bit of an issue for me. Maybe I am >just too lazy... but I always end up forgetting to recompile things. So when >I make a couple small chang

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I've got a pretty complex application underway with Webware, Cheetah and > (just recently added) FunFormKit. I've never noticed any rough edges in > Webware or Cheetah. The great thing about different people using the same tools, but somewhat diffe

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 20:28, Luke Holden wrote: > Unfortunately Webware has this really unfinished feeling to it. There are certain parts of Webware that aren't being used as much as others. For instance, I've never once included or forwarded to another servlet. It doesn't generally feel right t

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:15 pm, you wrote: > That's not to say there's something wrong with those methods, but > perhaps they aren't used as much. The core WebKit functionality really > is pretty stable and reliable. If you really do want to use

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Edmund Lian
On 01/12/2003 10:15:44 PM Ian wrote: >There are certain parts of Webware that aren't being used as much as >others. For instance, I've never once included or forwarded to another >servlet. It doesn't generally feel right to me -- other forms of >factoring work better. > >That's not to say there

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Edmund Lian
On 01/12/2003 10:30:53 PM Luke wrote: >1) Page design should have almost nothing to do with logic, except for basic >display logic. >2) Actions should have little to do with the actual page. With actions you are >usually trying to do something like manipulate data... or something to that >effect.

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:33, Edmund Lian wrote: > I did have exactly the same problems with forwarding and inclusion as Luke. > They're not quite so straightforward to fix since they require changes to > Application (I think--can't remember now). > > In the end, I just avoided the problem by using

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (ROTFL... and again I forget to send the email to the mailing list...) On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:45 pm, Edmund Lian wrote: > There's hope. I achieve 1, 3, 4 with Webware, Cheetah, and logic in > Page.py. I used to have 2 until I switched over to F

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 22:26, Luke Holden wrote: > On Sunday 12 January 2003 07:33 pm, Edmund Lian wrote: > > In the end, I just avoided the problem by using redirects. But redirects > > don't resolve URLs they way Luke (and I) expected. I just wrote my own URL > > normalizer and wrapped it around .

Re: [Webware-devel] love hate relationships =)

2003-01-12 Thread Luke Holden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Okay... I've submitted a patch that seems to address the problems I was having with includeURL and forward(). Please note... it works on my end.. and now those two methods function as expected reguardless of what order/situation/directory they are u

[Webware-devel] [ webware-Patches-666560 ] Let non reletive urls work in forward() and includeURL()

2003-01-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #666560, was opened at 2003-01-11 23:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304866&aid=666560&group_id=4866 Category: WebKit Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luke Holden (lholden) Assigned to: Stuart Donald