On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:23 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> I personally tend towards fairly open security, but I'm not sure what
> other people feel. We probably should have a backup plan at least for
> the svn repository.
The company I work for (PeaceWorks Computer Consulting) is willing to
provid
On 10/21/05, Jason Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 16:23 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> > I personally tend towards fairly open security, but I'm not sure what
> > other people feel. We probably should have a backup plan at least for
> > the svn repository.
>
> The compa
I just checked in a change that makes the PythonServletFactory
responsible for .pyc and .pyo files as well besides .py files.
For the default configuration, this makes no difference,
since .pyc and .pyo are in both ExtensionsToIgnore and FilesToHide
so they will not be served anyway.
But by tak
I really would like to go for the 0.9 release now.
Mark, if you do not find the time, and nobody else volunteers, I can try
to do it this weekend. Let me know whether I shall do it and which
things to heed besides the ReleaseProcedures.html which seem to be outdated.
I'm suggesting to make th
On 10/21/05, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really would like to go for the 0.9 release now.
[snip]
I support this and will put in some testing tomorrow (Saturday).
-Chuck
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Archit
On 10/21/05, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked in a change that makes the PythonServletFactory
> responsible for .pyc and .pyo files as well besides .py files.
>
> For the default configuration, this makes no difference,
> since .pyc and .pyo are in both ExtensionsToIg
