Hallo,
Mark Phillips hat gesagt: // Mark Phillips wrote:
> I would put my two cents on version 2.3, but only because 2.4 does
> not run on older OS's like Fedora Core 1 and 2.
One important "older OS" to me and I guess to many others is Debian
stable, which is in use on many webservers out the
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> One important "older OS" to me and I guess to many others is Debian
> stable, which is in use on many webservers out there. I would like to
> see Webware not require any Python that is not in Debian stable at the
> time of release. Cur
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> One important "older OS" to me and I guess to many others is Debian
> stable, which is in use on many webservers out there. I would like to
> see Webware not require any Python that is not in Debian stable at the
> time of release.
The same applies to the Enterprise distri
I'm a Java web app developer turned Webware developer. I'm very
interested in the remote debugging issues noted in the list archives
message:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3879709
Last night I was reading about WSGI (PEP333) and Paste. It seems like
there may be some
As announced, a new beta release of Webware for Python is available for
testing. It contains a lot of bug fixes and improvements, including many
old issues from the SourceForge tracker. Backward compatibility with
Python <2.3 has been fixed in many places. The idea is to switch to
Python 2.3 or
