Right, right. I confused myself. You were speaking specifically about the validation layer in FormEncode, and I confused that with FE in its entirety.
We're certainly open to improving the validation constructs in FK. I need to look at your library at some point soon. I know from your blog (which I enjoy, thanks) that you're not into form tag generation. We're not ready for that yet, but I sympathize. Should people need tag generation, I doubt that there is anything much better than FormKit. Perhaps that's all Subway needs? On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:01:28 -0600, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it could be a plugin, unless there was some common API; > and if there's a common API then I don't know what real reason there > would be to substitute something else. Well... maybe that's not > entirely true. Really the only part that the form processor would have > to know about is the validation, the result of the conversion, and the > errors. For FormEncode's validators that's just: ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
