RE: [Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool...

2002-05-07 Thread Hancock, David (DHANCOCK)
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 11:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool... That creates another question in my head: If connections are created as instance variables for a servlet, when are they close()&#

Re: [Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool...

2002-05-06 Thread Costas Malamas
Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Costas Malamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool... >Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 22:30:40 -0400 > >If you are using store multiple times in a page it may be o

Re: [Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool...

2002-05-06 Thread Aaron Held
the close function, but I could never track it down and it went away with some rewriting of the startup code. -Aaron - Original Message - From: "Costas Malamas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:19 PM Subject: [Webware-disc

[Webware-discuss] More trouble with DBPool...

2002-05-06 Thread Costas Malamas
Expanding the recent discussion on DBPool, I tried to implement this on my site (http://memigo.com/) which does a lot of very heavy MySQL lifting --thus I need all the DB speed-up DBPool can give. DBPool seemed to be saturating the MySQL daemon and I had to go back to the old config. Let me s