On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:07:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:53:59AM -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, WSGIKit should run under multiprocess servers, like mod_python,
> > and maybe SkunkWeb will be a WSGI server soon (Jacob Smullyan is
> > planning on com
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:53:59AM -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> FWIW, WSGIKit should run under multiprocess servers, like mod_python,
> and maybe SkunkWeb will be a WSGI server soon (Jacob Smullyan is
> planning on coming to the PyCon WSGIKit sprint -- heck, maybe SkunkWeb
> already is a WSGI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the real question that I have is why the move?
Well, two reasons I suppose. One is that I've been reading
a lot lately about how silicon has effectively hit the wall
in terms of CPU heat dissipation: manufacturers such as AMD,
Intel, and IBM are turning to mutlico
>
> I guess the real question that I have is why the move?
Well, two reasons I suppose. One is that I've been reading
a lot lately about how silicon has effectively hit the wall
in terms of CPU heat dissipation: manufacturers such as AMD,
Intel, and IBM are turning to mutlicore processors to acie
se, I would love to keep an eye on this thread, I've often
thought of moving sites from one framework to another, but usually when
you get into it, unless your really motivated its generally a pain in
the backside
Jose
> Original Message
> Subject: [Webware-discus
I have nearly completed a test port of my hobby curve and
surface fitting web site, http://zunzun.com, from Webware
to Skunkweb. The conversion is sufficiently complete for
considerable comparitive testing to be made. I would like
to make these notes available for both mailing lists, if
anyone is
