* Chuck Esterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030226 19:20]:
> Your experiences and instruction in using AAP with Webware would make an
> excellent new Wiki page:
> http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bin/view/Webware
I started a Wiki page, but it's far from being excellent ;-)
http://webware.colorst
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 12:26, Jerome Kerdreux wrote:
> > http://webware.colorstudy.net/twiki/bin/view/Webware
>
> Is this still working ? even a nslookup colorstudy.net return empty
That should be webware.colorstudy.com, not .net
Ian
---
On Monday 24 February 2003 11:59 pm, Jeremy Lowery wrote:
> After this bugger is up and running I'm probably going to hack
> webware and make it auto compile tmpl files and stick the
> template-servlets into a cache var directory, thus removing the need
> for cheetah compile and all the extra files
* Jeremy Lowery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030225 09:20]:
> I'd have to say that the only thing I don't like about this setup is how
> polluted my directories get.
> foo.tmpl
> foo.py
> foo.pyc
> foo.py_bak
>
> at least 3 files for every (file).
I'm using separated "Templates/" and "Servlets/" direct
Call for help and the point below the PHP comment.
The number of php users is extreme, there are hundereds of forums, places to
This is the problem w/ Webware. Its very good for complex business
interaction, combining pythons rapid development w/ a long running
servlet architecture.
PHP is ex
From: "George Clinton"
If anyone is interested in exchanging experiences similiar to those id love
to hear from you.
GC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I'm very new to Webware and I'm developing my first app with it. After
a few days of researching and reading, I've gotten a basic site framework
ide
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 19:38, Ian Bicking wrote:
> We don't have to write it from scratch -- it would be fine (and probably
> more successful) if someone donated their application and then the
> community enhanced it. There's lots of Webware applications out there,
> but not many very public ones.
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 05:17, George Clinton wrote:
> IMHO we are missing a discussion and examples of good webware application
> design. The examples provided in the tarball are extremely useful, however
> they are only oneshot programs.
I agree. It's been mentioned before, but I think an excelle
