> Is this the same EV1 that bought a SCO license?
Yes.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to
Lothar Scholz wrote:
I tried EV1 - when they called themself Rackshack. At least at this
time the transfer rate out of the USA was terrible slow for a server.
Getting 15 KB (instead of 90KB from sourceforge) via DSL from
Berlin/Germany.
Is this the same EV1 that bought a SCO license?
-
Hallo,
Jason Hildebrand hat gesagt: // Jason Hildebrand wrote:
> I agree that it would be a great sample app, but I'd propose not to build
> a general "portal solution" (at least not right away ;) -- but to build a
> site customized to the needs of the Webware project. It should be simple
> to st
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:41, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> This would be really great. I would like to extent this effort to
> include the "dogbowl" effect: The next Webware site IMO should be run
> by Webware. I know this is next to impossible to do on the
> Sourceforge
> servers, so maybe some externa
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 12:12, jose wrote:
> Well as far as the logos go, we did have a some contributions, but I
> don't remember there actually being any decision as to which would be
> official.
You're right, I don't think we actually did decide on one. Maybe we should
try to do that...
>Fr
Well as far as the logos go, we did have a some contributions, but I
don't remember there actually being any decision as to which would be
official. I still have all the submitted logos on my website and you
can certainly use any image you wish. The site with the logos is:
http://balac.compmed.u
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Jason Hildebrand hat gesagt: // Jason Hildebrand wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly and I wanted to follow up on the idea of improving
visibility of the Webware project. For people who aren't subscribed
to the list (and there are probably many), the website is the prim
Hallo,
Jason Hildebrand hat gesagt: // Jason Hildebrand wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly and I wanted to follow up on the idea of improving
> visibility of the Webware project. For people who aren't subscribed
> to the list (and there are probably many), the website is the primary
> source of info
