I have compiled a "how-to" for this process, blending the advice from
Cactus at SME, with that from Gary and Christoph on this list.
[url]http://www.mophilly.com/wiki/Installing_%
26_Configuring_Webware_on_SME_7.2[/url]
I will add the instructions for the boot process, if there is
anythin
Mark Phillips wrote:
> FYI, next on my list of items to compete is the boot/shutdown script
> for init.d, and Webware is ready for my application code.
There are a few templates in WebKit/StartScripts, of which Webware picks
one that seems to fit on your system. You may want to pick another one
Just a follow up on this topic:
The compilation worked just fine following Gary's instructions with a
couple of additional steps to conform to SME 7 standards as suggested
by mcairn of the SME documentation team.
The test of Webware worked fine; all the examples worked "out of the
box", pro
On Dec 29, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> It should work with Apache 2.0 as well. Only the make.bat and dll file
> for Windows are Apache 2.2 specific.
Thank you, Chris, for the clarification.
I look forward to setting this up soon.
- Mark Phillips
-
Mark Phillips wrote:
> The WebKit discussion mentions apache 1.3. and apache 2.2. The WebKit
> for apache 1.3 version won't work with apache 2.0.
>
> Will the WebKit for apache 2.2 work with apache 2.0? That is, is it
> dependent on 2.2 features or is the reference to 2.2 the highest
> versi
Quoting Gary Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I cannot address whether or not the latest version of Webware is
dependent on any Apache 2.2-specific features, but--having used many
different versions of Webware on a variety of different platforms and
OSes--my guess is that its dependencies would be limi
Hi Mark,
I have Webware 0.9.2 running successfully on a CentOS 4.4 (Final) box
with Apache 2.0.52 at work with no problems.
I wrote up instructions to install Webware 0.9.4 on CentOS 5 with
Apache 2.2.3, and if memory serves, the procedure for both is pretty
much identical, and it's fairly
