CONGRATULATION and many THANKS to all webwork-developer for this GREAT work!
other on www:
jspinsider.com
other newsgroups:
comp.lang.java.softwaretools
??? j2ee appserver ???:
bea
ibm
borland
oracle
orion
jboss
etc.
Cheers
-Paolo
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Rickard [mailto:[E
Matt Baldree wrote:
> Well, WW 1.0 is out the door. Many thanks go out to everyone involved
> especially Rickard and Maurice. The only thing left now is for Rickard to
> announce WW to the world.
You bet. So, what's the laundry list? I can think of:
* TSS
* JavaLobby
* EJB-INTEREST
* JSP-INTERES
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] 1.0 released!
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:13:01 -0600
From: Dave Bryson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Baldree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 21 March 2002 07:45 pm, you wrote:
> Well, WW 1.0 is out the door. Many thanks go o
Well, WW 1.0 is out the door. Many thanks go out to everyone involved
especially Rickard and Maurice. The only thing left now is for Rickard to
announce WW to the world.
-Matt
___
Webwork-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.
Matt Baldree wrote:
> Rickard, are you going to release?
Sure, I can do that almost now. Unfortunately I'm in the middle of a
massive CVS update on another project and since I'm currently a modem
looser it takes awhile... as soon as it's done I'll commit my very last
changes (touching up) an
Rickard, are you going to release?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rickard Oberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Taavi Tiirik"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Webwork-user] tag enchantment
On 21/3/02 10:53 PM, "Rickard" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned the
words:
> Taavi Tiirik wrote:
>
<>
>>
>> Please share your thoughts about this. How do you deal with this?
>
> This is a very good question, that I haven't deal with myself (but need to).
Surely you have?
Easy way to replicate a bu
Taavi Tiirik wrote:
> I think property tag could use some extra functionality that would make
> putting information into action views a lot easier.
>
> Problem with using property tag is obvious. It does not do any escaping
> of special characters. I think it should.
>
> For example:
> Followin
Dear webwork developers/users,
I think property tag could use some extra functionality that would make
putting information into action views a lot easier.
Problem with using property tag is obvious. It does not do any escaping
of special characters. I think it should.
For example:
Following tex