I was partially correct. WW does find methods with or without 'get'. So
this will work.
This will find a
method public String string(String whatever) and return true.
But this does not
work hence your question.
I can duplicate this bug by adding a #13 test to expression test page. It
will n
Matt,
Thanks for the answer - but why does the first one work then? Why does
it print out B?
Cheers,
Scott
Matt Baldree wrote:
> see inline
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:10 PM
> Subjec
see inline
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Farquhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: [Webwork-user] webwork:if tag problems
> I am having problems with the webwork:if tag, and I am not sure if I am
> doing something wrong.
>
>
You can take the ui:radio in the form test and duplicate it and it works
fine. Can you duplicate the error with one of the test pages or submit some
code?
- Original Message -
From: "Graf Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Matt Baldree'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "WebWork-Use
You might also want to look at
action.standard.ClientInfo. It has browser detection
stuff.
-Matt
On Tue, 23 April 2002, "Toby Hede" wrote
>
> That is a very interesting idea. Thanks.
>
> Truth be told, I have been playing with .Net (boo
hiss! traitor!) and one of
> things I am impressed with
That is a very interesting idea. Thanks.
Truth be told, I have been playing with .Net (boo hiss! traitor!) and one of
things I am impressed with is its use of browser-aware server-side controls.
However, Webwork pretty much has the basis of this stuff already and
extending it seems like a reasona
thanks for the suggestion but that doesn't help.
It's actually written with quotes.
Here the example again:
Any other suggestions from anyone?
-patrick
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Matt Baldree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Samstag, 20. April 2002 13:16
> An: Gr
