Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we can
> think about splitting it.
>
> Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-devel
> and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
> messages a
IMHO it should all just go to the os-ww list - and if it's too much, we can
think about splitting it.
Looking back at the archives for the past few weeks (I have both ww-devel
and ww-user filtered into the same folder) - there's rarely more than 5
messages a day to _both_ lists (and often cross p
os-ww list for all WW related stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: [Webwork-devel] Re: [Webwork-user] WW integration
> Is there no separate ww development list? Is th
Is there no separate ww development list? Is there a large volume of
development mail on the os-developer list? Or should ww development just go
to the os-ww list?
> WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
> moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
> below). I'm cu
Also, if you are interested in CVS updates, you will
need to sign up for that mailing list as well as the
others.
On Wed, 17 July 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>
> WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
> moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list
(see
> below). I'm curr
WW is now integrated with Open Symphony. Please take a
moment to sign up for the appropriate mailing list (see
below). I'm currently in the process of migrating our
documentation to HTML. I hope to have this done by
week's end. I'm only trying to duplicate what we have
with a few revisions. Later,
