ready have Jira, so this
sounds quite logical as a next step.
Kind regards,
Aapo Laakkonen
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Webwork-us
> Need to get this scenario recorded.
> Aapo, will you add a comment?
Mission Completed, :-).
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
n server
side.
Or have I missed or misunderstood something in WebWork... does it
already have this mechanism implemented?
Kind Regards
Aapo Laakkonen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's
> Remember you can tier your views meaning you
> can indicate a base action that will just return
> SUCCESS and define more specific successes as you
> see fit.
Hehee.. now I feel a little bit stupid.
> So a call to my.xxx.action will map to xxx.vm and
> my.yyy.action will map to yyy.vm or calls
ult to implement with WebWork. Or do you suggest some other ways
to do this?
Kind Regards
Aapo Laakkonen
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://dev
>> What is the proper way to map an action directly to a view?
>>
>> WebWork examples has one example of this, but it doesn't seem to work
>> on webwork 1.0.3:
>>
>> jspaction.action=jspaction.jsp jspaction.success=jspactionsuccess.jsp
>> jspaction.error=jspactionerror.jsp
>
> Why do you need a
What is the proper way to map an action directly to a view?
WebWork examples has one example of this, but it doesn't seem to work on
webwork 1.0.3:
jspaction.action=jspaction.jsp
jspaction.success=jspactionsuccess.jsp
jspaction.error=jspactionerror.jsp
This is the error message:
java.lang.NoCl
