(Sent this to Matt, but I think the whole list should see it)
By the way, action chaining really is huge (finding more and more cool stuff
to do with it today). Think of this, developers can start building actions
that can be arbitrality chained together, creating a mini-workflow of sorts.
For ex
If an error was passed along ActionSupport will change
the view to INPUT so you will need an input view. If
that is not the fix, zip me up something and I'll take
a look.
-Matt
On Fri, 14 June 2002, "Patrick Lightbody" wrote
>
> Matt,
> This doesn't appear to be working for cases such as
the f
I implemented a preliminary version of action chaining.
It is available in CVS with a simple test case. This
has not been extensively tested so *beware*. I'm
looking for early testers.
The basic logic is the following:
1. Setup your chain in your view mapping.
2. The dispatcher will walk the cha
The last thing I remember was that you were going to
submit some scenarios where it makes sense.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, "Patrick Lightbody" wrote
>
> So what's the status with action chaining? Last I
heard, it looked like it
> was being questioned and wasn't going to be
implemented. If this is th
So what's the status with action chaining? Last I heard, it looked like it
was being questioned and wasn't going to be implemented. If this is the
case, let me know and I'll come up with some good real world examples where
I could have used it.
-Pat
__
