Re: medical vendors as Business Associates

2003-02-28 Thread Doug Webb
David, Amen! I would much rather have a clear answer beforehand thanenforcement afterword. The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of LCMH. Douglas M. WebbComputer System EngineerLittle Company of Mary Hospital Health Care Centers[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This

RE: PHI In Mail

2003-02-28 Thread Schmidt, Lee M
Title: Glacier Is there a HIPAA requirement on how to dispose of returned mail that contains PHI? If not, how do folks within this workgroup plan on disposing of it? Thanks, Lee M. Schmidt Magellan Behavioral Health HIPAA / I.T. Project Manager, Claims Applications Local:

RE: PHI In Mail

2003-02-28 Thread Bentz-Miller, Judith
Title: Glacier Lee, weplace it inside of the patient'smedical records so when we see the patient again, we can hand it to them and get a new address. Note that the unreturned mail isNOT part of our Designated Record Set, since it is a duplicate of a part of the DRS. (billing, lab results,

RE: Amendment Questions

2003-02-28 Thread David Ermer
Matt -- I respectfully question your response. The Privacy Rule, 45 CFR § 164.526(a), states that individuals have the right to request an amendment as long as the CE holds the PHI in a designated record set. Neither § 164.526 or § 164.524 (the access right) create an exception for PHI created or

RE: PHI In Mail

2003-02-28 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message How about shredding it. Dennis Hare Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy Officer Central Missouri Regional Center (573) 882-9835 Fax - (573) 884-4294 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and

Re: PHI In Mail

2003-02-28 Thread Doug Webb
Title: Glacier Likewise. The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of LCMH. Douglas M. WebbComputer System EngineerLittle Company of Mary Hospital Health Care Centers[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This electronic message may contain information that is confidential

RE: Custodial parent rights to minor's PHI

2003-02-28 Thread Deborah Campbell
Title: RE: Custodial parent rights to minor's PHI I seem to remember from the August revisions, that this depends on the state laws. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Deborah -Original Message- From: Giesecke, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 3:14 PM

Another thread on Security/Privacy question

2003-02-28 Thread Christine Hudnall
I'm sending this out again, if someone could please help us. Thanks. Christine What about the card swipes that we use when a patient makes a payment on their account using their credit card. Yes, we only swipe the card and put in the last four digits of the number, but the patient name (or

Custodial parent rights to minor's PHI

2003-02-28 Thread Giesecke, Steve
I have a question regarding PHI disclosure with respect to minors when there has been a divorce and one parent has been assigned custody. My understanding is that only the parent with legal custody can (legally) access the children's PHI but I can't put my finger on the reference for this

Re: Custodial parent rights to minor's PHI

2003-02-28 Thread Doug Webb
Steve, The Court rulings in the individual case would determine which parent(s) have access to how much PHI. There may also be State laws that override a decree from a different State. In general, the custodial parent has primary responsibility for the child's healthcare, but in Family

Re: Another thread on Security/Privacy question

2003-02-28 Thread Doug Webb
Chistine, I'll give it a shot. My comments are below your questions. The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of LCMH. Douglas M. WebbComputer System EngineerLittle Company of Mary Hospital Health Care Centers[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This electronic message may

RE: Amendment Questions

2003-02-28 Thread Matthew Rosenblum
David, In many instances the CE's DSR is maintained by a BA, and those CE-BA relationships are subject to the transition requirements and the timing of the execution of the BAC. Given this, and the explicit exemption given for accountings for PHI created prior to the compliance date, I would say

RE: Amendment Questions

2003-02-28 Thread David Ermer
Matt -- Here is an interesting excerpt from the 12/28/00 HHS Preamble which clearly supports my position: Comment: Several comments raised questions about the application of the rule to individually identifiable information created prior to (1) the effective date of the rule, and (2) the

RE: Amendment Questions

2003-02-28 Thread Matthew Rosenblum
Dave, I must respectfully disagree with your application of the QA that you cited (below). Clearly that QA was intended to convey HHS' intent that on and after the compliance date the Privacy Rule will protect all PHI that a CE creates or maintains about an individual, regardless of when that