RE: Unlocked charts

2003-03-07 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message



Cindi, I have to 
disagree with you.  The definition of a Business Associate is someone that 
"performs certain funtions or activities that involve the use of 
disclosure of protected health informatin on behalf of [my emphasis], 
or provides services to, a covered entity."  A janitorial crew does not in 
any way use PHI to perform their job functions.  A repairman (e.g. 
computer tech) might use PHI in order to recover or fix a problem, thus could be 
a business associate.  However, privacy and security rules require a 
covered entity to take reasonable precautions to avoid improper 
disclosure.  So, for a janitorial crew, that could mean keeping your files 
either in locked cabinets or behind locked doors, and keeping your desks 
clean.  Our agency has a large records room with open shelving, so we lock 
the doors and the cleaning crew is never allowed in the 
room.
 
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients 
named above. The designated recipients are prohibited from redisclosing this 
information to any other party without authorization and are required to destroy 
the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited by federal or state 
law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me 
immediately by telephone at (573) 882-9835, and destroy all copies of this 
communication and any attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:43 PMTo: WEDI SNIP 
  Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE: Unlocked 
  charts
  Cindy,
   
  The key work here is incidential.  I 
  don't feel this would be an incidential disclosure since you know the 
  cleaning folks will have access to PHI.  See text below from another list 
  about the topc.
   
  Date 1/16/03
  "...yesterday during a conference call 
  with 2,000 plus conferees, Linda Sanchez of DHHS clarified the incidental 
  disclosure concept in a way that I thought made sense and which I hadn't seen 
  discussed in the regulatory preambles or the recent OCR Guidance document. In 
  the context of someone coming in to your facility to do repairs on machinery, 
  for example, she said in sum or substance that if you know that a repairperson 
  *WILL* have access to PHI as part of her/his job to repair something, then 
  that is not an incidental disclosure, and must be addressed in a Business 
  Associate Contract".
   
  
  Cindi Bowman Quality and Compliance Coordinator Catawba County 
  Health Department 828-695-5847 
   
  
-Original Message-From: Rupe, Cindy 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 
12:48 PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: 
RE: Unlocked charts
The OCR 
guidance states that a BA is not required:
 
With persons 
or organizations (e.g. janitorial sercie or electrician) whose functions or 
services do not involve the use or disclosure of protected health 
information, and where any access to protected health information by such 
persons would be incidental, if at all.
 
Thanks, 
Cindy

Cindy Rupe, RHIA, CPHQ HIPAA 
Coord/Consultant Billings Area IHS 406-247-7161 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

HIPAA Ready, HIPAA Compliant, and HIPAA 
Aware 

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 07, 
  2003 10:15 AMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup 
  ListSubject: RE: Unlocked charts
  This was 
  brought up in San Diego by the folks from OCR.  One of them said her 
  owned doctor accused her of being "one of those people who are making us 
  put locks on our file cabinets."  She stated that the requirement is 
  to keep the PHI private.  If the file cabinet is in a patient area, 
  it might be wise to lock it.  If it is out of a public area, the 
  location may be all that is needed to keep it private.
  *The 
  cleaning company should sign a BAA.
   
  
  Joanne 
  Marquez
  Senior 
  Director 
  Beech 
  Street Corporation
  Account 
  Services
  (949) 
  672-1519
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:06 PMTo: WEDI 
SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: Unlocked 
chartsThis has probably been covered before, but for those 
of us still

RE: Unlocked charts

2003-03-07 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message



Cindi,
 
I don't see a 
harm in doing a BAA with a janitorial company, but I also don't really see the 
need for it.   A repair person having access to PHI to do their job 
(such as a computer or copier repairman) is different than a janitor who should 
not have access to it to do his/her job because his/her job does not inherently 
involve using PHI.  Maybe a fine point that an organization wouldn't want 
to run the risk on, however.   I suspect a lot of organizations are 
going to go overboard to play it safe "just in case".
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients 
named above. The designated recipients are prohibited from redisclosing this 
information to any other party without authorization and are required to destroy 
the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited by federal or state 
law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me 
immediately by telephone at (573) 882-9835, and destroy all copies of this 
communication and any attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:54 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  RE: Unlocked charts
  Dennis,
   
  I am not sure where your disagreement 
  exists with me since I did not say they 
  are a business associate.  It was a DHHS member that said 
  "if you know that a repairperson *WILL* have access to PHI as part of 
  her/his job to repair something, then that is not an incidental disclosure, 
  and must be addressed in a Business Associate Contract".
   
  Given that, I don't see where a BAA would 
  cause harm, as suggested by the DHHS member.  For example in our 
  situation, where an outside janitorial service has unsupervised access to 
  all our medical records when they clean after hours.  We have an open 
  filing system so there is no way to lock or secure the records.  What 
  would be the harm for us to follow DHHS and have a BAA in place?
   
   
  Cindi
  
    -Original Message-From: Hare, Dennis 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 
4:45 PMTo: Cindi Bowman; WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup 
ListSubject: RE: Unlocked charts
Cindi, I have 
to disagree with you.  The definition of a Business Associate is 
someone that "performs certain funtions or activities that involve 
the use of disclosure of protected health informatin on behalf of 
[my emphasis], or provides services to, a covered entity."  A 
janitorial crew does not in any way use PHI to perform their job 
functions.  A repairman (e.g. computer tech) might use PHI in order to 
recover or fix a problem, thus could be a business associate.  However, 
privacy and security rules require a covered entity to take reasonable 
precautions to avoid improper disclosure.  So, for a janitorial crew, 
that could mean keeping your files either in locked cabinets or behind 
locked doors, and keeping your desks clean.  Our agency has a large 
records room with open shelving, so we lock the doors and the cleaning crew 
is never allowed in the room.
 
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional 
Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY 
NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any 
attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use 
of the designated recipients named above. The designated recipients are 
prohibited from redisclosing this information to any other party without 
authorization and are required to destroy the information after its stated 
need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that 
any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its 
contents is prohibited by federal or state law. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify me immediately by telephone at (573) 
882-9835, and destroy all copies of this communication and any 
attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:43 PMTo: WEDI SNIP 
  Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE: Unlocked 
  char

RE: NPP

2003-03-07 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message



Health Plans are not 
required to get your acknowledgment signature.  They only need to provide 
you with a copy of the NPP.  See page 109 of the OCR HIPAA Privacy 
Guidance.
 
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients 
named above. The designated recipients are prohibited from redisclosing this 
information to any other party without authorization and are required to destroy 
the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited by federal or state 
law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me 
immediately by telephone at (573) 882-9835, and destroy all copies of this 
communication and any attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: Traci Winter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:19 
  PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: 
  NPP
  Interesting occurrence just took place..
   
  I just received a NPP from Guardian Life Insurance Co. It was put in my 
  inter-office mailbox by our HR staff person. There is no acknowledgement form 
  for me to sign.. Do they think by having my employer distribute them that 
  they are not required to make a good faith effort to get an acknowledgement 
  signed? Just seems a little off to me. Does anyone else find this a little 
  lacking? 
   
  Traci Winter 
  Hospitals Home Health Care, Inc.
  Fulton, NY---The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed 
  is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the 
  views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the 
  views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an 
  official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at 
  http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for 
  commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and 
  services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal 
  disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.You are 
  currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To 
  unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
  http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]If you need to unsubscribe but 
  your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the 
  list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org 

---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org




RE: PHI In Mail

2003-02-28 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message



How about shredding 
it.
 
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients 
named above. The designated recipients are prohibited from redisclosing this 
information to any other party without authorization and are required to destroy 
the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited by federal or state 
law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me 
immediately by telephone at (573) 882-9835, and destroy all copies of this 
communication and any attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: Schmidt, Lee M 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 
  2003 8:34 AMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: 
  RE: PHI In MailImportance: High
   
  Is there a 
  HIPAA requirement on how to dispose of returned mail that contains 
  PHI?
   
  If not, how do 
  folks within this workgroup plan on disposing of it?
   
  Thanks,
   
  Lee M. Schmidt
  Magellan Behavioral 
  Health
  HIPAA / I.T. Project Manager, 
  Claims Applications Local: (314) 387-5445 Toll Free 
  (St. Louis): 1-800-450-7281 ext: 75445  New Cell: (314) 
  960-0964 
  
  
  Fax: 314-387-5655 or 314-292-1120 
  (Electronic)E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

<>

RE: HIPAA privacy and telephone

2003-01-17 Thread Hare, Dennis
Title: Message




Please read the 
following from the OCR Frequently Asked Questions list at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/privacy.html:
 
May 
physician's offices or pharmacists leave messages for patients at their homes, 
either on an answering machine or with a family member, to remind them of 
appointments or to inform them that a prescription is ready?  May providers continue to mail 
appointment or prescription refill reminders to patients' homes?
 
A:    
Yes.  The HIPAA Privacy Rule 
permits health care providers to communicate with patients regarding their 
health care.  This includes 
communicating with patients at their homes, whether through the mail or by phone 
or in some other manner.  In 
addition, the Rule does not prohibit covered entities from leaving messages for 
patients on their answering machines.  
However, to reasonably safeguard the individual's privacy, covered 
entities should take care to limit the amount of information disclosed on the 
answering machine.  For example, a 
covered entity might want to consider leaving only its name and number and other 
information necessary to confirm an appointment, or ask the individual to call 
back.
 
A covered entity also may 
leave a message with a family member or other person who answers the phone when 
the patient is not home.  The 
Privacy Rule permits covered entities to disclose limited information to family 
members, friends, or other persons regarding an individual's care, even when the 
individual is not present.  However, 
covered entities should use professional judgment to assure that such 
disclosures are in the best interest of the individual and limit the information 
disclosed.  See 45 CFR 
164.510(b)(3).
 
 

Dennis Hare
Quality Assurance Spec./Privacy 
Officer
Central Missouri Regional Center
(573) 882-9835  Fax - (573) 
884-4294
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain 
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients 
named above. The designated recipients are prohibited from redisclosing this 
information to any other party without authorization and are required to destroy 
the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited by federal or state 
law. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me 
immediately by telephone at (573) 882-9835, and destroy all copies of this 
communication and any attachments.

  
  -Original Message-From: Clay, Roy III (NO) 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:09 
  PMTo: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup ListSubject: RE: HIPAA 
  privacy and telephone
  My feeling is that unless you have authorization from the 
  patient, anything other than giving the results directly to the patient is not 
  allowed. You wish you can have an opt-in question on the order of "Do we have 
  your permission to leave medical information with your spouse?(Y/N) These 
  responses would have to be tracked and adhered to. 
  -Original Message- From: Doug 
  Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:51 AM To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List Subject: 
  Re: HIPAA privacy and telephone 
  An extension to this -- how do you handle answering 
  machines? 
  My gut feeling is that either a no-no (the machine more 
  questionable than a family member) -- the information could only be released 
  to the patient or his/her representative designated in a written 
  authorizaton.  Perhaps another signature on your main 
  consent/authorization form to allow these types of communications is what's 
  needed???
  The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the 
  opinion of LCMH. 
  Douglas M. Webb Computer System 
  Engineer Little Company of Mary Hospital & Health 
  Care Centers [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  "This electronic message may contain information that is 
  confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the 
  individual(s) and entity(s)  named as recipients in the message. If you 
  are not an intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender 
  immediately,  delete the material from any computer, do not deliver, 
  distribute, or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take 
  action in reliance on the information it contains. Thank 
  you."
  - Original Message - From: 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WEDI SNIP Privacy 
  Workgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 04:04 PM Subject: HIPAA privacy and telephone 
  > I would like the lists opinion on this topic. 
  > > Patient comes to the office 
  to have their potassium checked because they are on a diuretic.  Later, 
  the physician's nurse calls the patien